paper 3 0.0 / 5 ? Sociologypaper 3GCSEOCR Created by: faypowellCreated on: 18-03-14 13:19 whats good about her hypothesis? shes being specific about whats shes aiming to do. 1 of 13 whats bad about her hypothesis? shes not specific on what attitudes she is trying to talk about. 2 of 13 whats good about her overall conclusion? she has partly answered her hypothesis in her conclusion. 3 of 13 whats bad about her overall conclusion? shes made some comments which don't connect to her hypothesis, also shes very brief and is just getting to the point. 4 of 13 whats wrong with her conclusion? she hasnt talked about her hypothesis in her conclusion meaning she hasn't achieved her aim in her investigation. 5 of 13 whats good about the researcher? her investigation is a recent and up to date investigation, 6 of 13 whats bad about the researcher? its could end up being an issue that she is female because it could lead to researcher bias. 7 of 13 whats are the advantages of her introduction?(part 1) she has linked her introduction to her hypothesis and has also talked about attitudes. 8 of 13 what are the disadvantages of her introduction?(part 1) shes made her answer opinionated(she has been bias) 9 of 13 what are the advantages of her introduction?(part 2) shes still being specific about her hypothesis. 10 of 13 what are the disadvantages of her introduction?(part 2) she then starts to become stereotypical. 11 of 13 in sorce 1 does she have a sample and what is it? yes,she has a sample which was a survey which had been done in 1965. 12 of 13 source 2 will her table be any use? no because she has missed out some of the occupational groups this now means that the data is unvaild. 13 of 13
Comments
No comments have yet been made