Conditioned suppression of licking procedure Irrespective of US intensity, hardly any forgetting after 60 days last 60 days
1 of 21
Henderson, 1978)
Fear conditioning procedures with shock US: B is excitatory CS, X is the trained inhibitor So in a more complex learning situation, some forgetting seen within 35 days
2 of 21
(Gordon et al., 1979)
Avoidance learning procedure (CS shock) Relatively high latencies show forgetting tested 3 days later Memory performance improved by a reminder (apparatus and CS exposure) 24 hr or 10 min prior to test
3 of 21
Gordon et al., 1981)
Avoidance learning procedure (CS shock) Relatively high latencies to move show forgetting Forgetting induced by context switch was reduced by a reminder (placed in a box similar to the apparatus)
4 of 21
Godden and Baddeley, (1975)
d-d 13.5, d-w 8.6, w-d 8.4, w-w 11.4 learning envi first then recall
5 of 21
Balch & Lewis, 1996; Smith, 1985
music version of task
6 of 21
Goldman & Seamon, 1992
Children’s toys version of GB
7 of 21
Rubin et al., 1984
Mothballs, baby powder - GB task
8 of 21
Aggleton & Waskett, 1999
Museum smells - GB
9 of 21
Tulving & Thomson (1973)
Encoding in context provides memory triggers Category names (e.g., animal) for word lists (e.g., cow, rat, etc.)
10 of 21
Tulving & Pearlstone, 1966
Effective cues to retrieval of items that would not be retrieved under non-cued recall conditions
11 of 21
Parker et al., (2001) NEEDS CHECKING
N = standard test conditions R = condition with lavender, Mozart, dim lights, conversational and reassuring instructions (‘20% of people score
12 of 21
Overton (1964
Rats trained to escape from unavoidable shock in a T-maze Sodium pentobarbital produced ‘dissociated learning’ in rats Seen when performance of tasks learned in the drug state does not transfer to the non-drug state But learn react if drug reinstated
13 of 21
Goodwin et al. (1969)
(non-alcoholic) subjects can’t remember, when sober, what happened when drunk. May remember when next drunk
amphetamine did result in state-dependency (free recall task, drawing geometric shapes)
17 of 21
Carter & Cassaday (1998) CHECK
an antihistamine something to do with chlopheniramine memory effect
18 of 21
Clark and Teasdale, (1981)
mood
19 of 21
Eich (1980)
state dep unreli overshadowing effects- 88% studies showing evidence for state-dependent effects used free recall tasks 90% studies that did not show state dependency used cued recall or recognition tests (familiar?) ...
20 of 21
...
Suggests internal state more important cue in the absence of ‘observable’ cues State-dependent effects consistent and reproducible only when contextual cues are not overshadowed by more explicit reminders
21 of 21
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Henderson, 1978)
Back
Fear conditioning procedures with shock US: B is excitatory CS, X is the trained inhibitor So in a more complex learning situation, some forgetting seen within 35 days
Comments
No comments have yet been made