Health Behaviours
- Created by: Rebecca_f
- Created on: 29-04-20 14:43
View mindmap
- Health impairing habits: Behavioural Pathogens
- What are HBs?
- Health protective behaviours: Behavioural Immunogens
- Health behaviours
- Why study?
- Mortality: HBs account for more deaths than metabolic/environmental factors
- Longevity: studies have shown that HBs are part of the reason for some parts of the world having longer life spans
- 1) Health locus of control
- How controllable we regard our health to be
- 3 dimensions: internal (i am directly responsible), external (health is down to luck), and powerful others (can only do as the doctor says)
- LoC related to behaviour change and adherence to medical advice
- 2) Risk perception
- Risk can be over or under estimated
- BUT studies show mostly unrealistically optimistic
- 4 Cognitive Factors to UO: lack of personal experience, believe problem is preventable, believe problem hasn't appeared yet so wont in future, and belief that the problem is infrequent
- Perceptions of individual risk are not rational
- BUT studies show mostly unrealistically optimistic
- Risk can be over or under estimated
- Criticisms of HB theories
- Problems with SCMs
- Overly complicated
- significant overlap between constructs that should be integrated: behavioural control, intentions and attitudes
- Models aren't successful at predicting behavioural intentions or actual behaviour
- Some behaviours are beyond the control of the individual, e.g. healthy diet in poverty
- Problems with IMs
- The COM-B model encourages researchers and practitioners use of a one size fits all approach
- this can limit the development of newer theories that may be better
- Reduce professionals to mere technicians who follow prescriptive rues and guidelines
- Individualised health care? Goes against current recommendations that health care should be personalised
- Naive to believe that one model could explain all HBs carried out by all people
- The COM-B model encourages researchers and practitioners use of a one size fits all approach
- Problems with SCMs
- Why study?
- What are HBs?
- Why study?
- Mortality: HBs account for more deaths than metabolic/environmental factors
- Longevity: studies have shown that HBs are part of the reason for some parts of the world having longer life spans
- 1) Health locus of control
- How controllable we regard our health to be
- 3 dimensions: internal (i am directly responsible), external (health is down to luck), and powerful others (can only do as the doctor says)
- LoC related to behaviour change and adherence to medical advice
- Sense of whether we are or are not susceptible to a health problem
- 2) Risk perception
- Risk can be over or under estimated
- BUT studies show mostly unrealistically optimistic
- 4 Cognitive Factors to UO: lack of personal experience, believe problem is preventable, believe problem hasn't appeared yet so wont in future, and belief that the problem is infrequent
- Perceptions of individual risk are not rational
- BUT studies show mostly unrealistically optimistic
- Risk can be over or under estimated
- 2) Risk perception
- 3) Motivation and self-determination
- Need to be motivated to start new HB or change existing
- SDT looks at motives that regulate behaviour
- 2 kinds of motivation
- Autonomous motivation: behaviours that fulfil personally relevant goals
- assoc with satisfaction, WB, persistence health related behaviours
- Controlled motivation: driven by external factors/stimuli
- assoc with lack of satisfaction and avoidance of HBs
- Autonomous motivation: behaviours that fulfil personally relevant goals
- 2 kinds of motivation
- Health behaviours
- Criticisms of HB theories
- Problems with SCMs
- Overly complicated
- significant overlap between constructs that should be integrated: behavioural control, intentions and attitudes
- Models aren't successful at predicting behavioural intentions or actual behaviour
- Some behaviours are beyond the control of the individual, e.g. healthy diet in poverty
- Problems with IMs
- The COM-B model encourages researchers and practitioners use of a one size fits all approach
- this can limit the development of newer theories that may be better
- Reduce professionals to mere technicians who follow prescriptive rues and guidelines
- Individualised health care? Goes against current recommendations that health care should be personalised
- Naive to believe that one model could explain all HBs carried out by all people
- The COM-B model encourages researchers and practitioners use of a one size fits all approach
- Problems with SCMs
- Criticisms of HB theories
- 4) Self Efficacy
- Expansion of SLT: belief in capability to organise an execute sources required to manage prospective situations
- closely related to confidence in ability to engage in HB, e.g. confident to stop smoking
- Theories of HB
- The 4 beliefs relate to HB and form key components of health theories
- Stage Models
- Individuals move through ordered stages as they change behaviour
- A stage model has 4 basic properties
- A classification system which defines and labels each stage
- Ordering of stages
- People within the same stage face the same challenges
- Each stage has unique challenges
- The 4 beliefs relate to HB and form key components of health theories
- Stage Models
- Individuals move through ordered stages as they change behaviour
- A stage model has 4 basic properties
- A classification system which defines and labels each stage
- Ordering of stages
- People within the same stage face the same challenges
- Each stage has unique challenges
- Stages of Change Model
- 1. Pre-contemplation: not intention to change
- 2. Contemplation: consider a change
- 3. Preparation: making small changes
- 4. Action: actively engaging in a new behaviour
- 5. Maintenance: sustaining change over time
- 4. Action: actively engaging in a new behaviour
- 3. Preparation: making small changes
- 2. Contemplation: consider a change
- Don't necessarily go through in sequence (can go back and forth, circular rather than linear)
- 1. Pre-contemplation: not intention to change
- E.g. i am happy being a smoker
- I have been coughing a lot, perhaps i should consider quitting
- I won't drink and i will buy a smaller pack
- I have stopped smoking
- it has been 4 months since i smoked
- I have stopped smoking
- I won't drink and i will buy a smaller pack
- I have been coughing a lot, perhaps i should consider quitting
- 1st half is the motivation stage: SE, outcome expectancy, threat appraisal
- The Health Action Process Approach
- 2nd half Action stage: cognitive factors (action plans) and situational factors (support/barriers)
- The Health Action Process Approach
- Social support: my friends will go to the gym with me
- Barriers: I don't have enough money for a membership
- Action plan: If if don'f feel like exercising i will look at this photo of me
- Problems with stage models
- Does behaviour change occur in stages or continuum??
- Are there really distinct stages?
- If there are stags, changes between them may be so fast that a stage is not important
- Too simplistic?
- focuses on planning processes but do we really make table coherent plans?
- Things may change making your plan unachievable
- Social Cognitive Models
- Examines the predictors and precursors to health behaviour; a continuum approach
- Based on SCT
- behaviour is ruled by expectancies, incentives and social cognitions
- Expectancies: a behaviour may be dangerous or reduce harm to health, or that a person is capable of the behaviour (SE)
- Incentives: behaviour is governed by its consequences
- Social Cognitions: reflect the individuals representation of their social worlds
- behaviour is ruled by expectancies, incentives and social cognitions
- Protection Motivation Theory
- Severity, susceptibility, responsive effectiveness, SE and fear channel into our behavioural intentions and thus behaviour
- E.g. Severity: bowel cancer is serious
- susceptibility: my risk is high
- RE: changing my diet would help
- SE: confident I can do that
- Fear: scared of getting BC
- Therefore, they intend to change
- Fear: scared of getting BC
- SE: confident I can do that
- RE: changing my diet would help
- susceptibility: my risk is high
- E.g. Severity: bowel cancer is serious
- How people protect their health against risk
- Severity, susceptibility, responsive effectiveness, SE and fear channel into our behavioural intentions and thus behaviour
- Theories of HB
- The 4 beliefs relate to HB and form key components of health theories
- The 4 beliefs relate to HB and form key components of health theories
- Protection Motivation Theory
- Severity, susceptibility, responsive effectiveness, SE and fear channel into our behavioural intentions and thus behaviour
- E.g. Severity: bowel cancer is serious
- susceptibility: my risk is high
- RE: changing my diet would help
- SE: confident I can do that
- Fear: scared of getting BC
- Therefore, they intend to change
- Fear: scared of getting BC
- SE: confident I can do that
- RE: changing my diet would help
- susceptibility: my risk is high
- E.g. Severity: bowel cancer is serious
- How people protect their health against risk
- Severity, susceptibility, responsive effectiveness, SE and fear channel into our behavioural intentions and thus behaviour
- Theory of Planned Behaviour
- Internal control factors and external control factors lead to behavioural control
- Beliefs about other peoples attitudes to behaviour and motivation to comply with them leads to subjective norms
- Beliefs about outcomes and evaluations of outcomes lead to attitudes towards behaviour
- Social Cognitive Models
- Examines the predictors and precursors to health behaviour; a continuum approach
- Based on SCT
- behaviour is ruled by expectancies, incentives and social cognitions
- Expectancies: a behaviour may be dangerous or reduce harm to health, or that a person is capable of the behaviour (SE)
- Incentives: behaviour is governed by its consequences
- Social Cognitions: reflect the individuals representation of their social worlds
- behaviour is ruled by expectancies, incentives and social cognitions
- Attitudes towards the behaviour, subjective norms and behavioural control feed into behavioural intentions and actual behaviour
- Attitudes: reducing alcohol intake would make my life more productive, and benefit my health
- Perceived control: I am capable of drinking less alcohol because I believe I have the skills needed and the support available
- Attitudes: reducing alcohol intake would make my life more productive, and benefit my health
- Subjective norms: my family want me to cut down and that is important to me
- Integrated models
- one model that consists of all of the most useful elements of previous theories
- Integrated models are small and focused
- derived from analysis of 83 pre-existing theories (over 1000 variables)
- The COM-B model
- Exposed 3 key factors: do not predict intentions but actual behaviour change
- Motivation e.g. I want to use a condom and I believe that it is the right thing to do
- Capability e.g. i have the skills needed to practice safe sex
- Opportunity e.g. my partner wants me to use a condom and i have got some
- Integrated models
- one model that consists of all of the most useful elements of previous theories
- Integrated models are small and focused
- Exposed 3 key factors: do not predict intentions but actual behaviour change
- The COM-B model
- The intention behaviour gap
- core element of theories is the use of intention as a means to predict behaviour; this link is not always straightforward
- even the best intention may not translate to behaviour
- 2 ways to address this problem...
- Past behaviour and habit
- accounts for 13% of future behaviour
- Can indirectly influence a change in cognition: more common in behaviours that are infrequent
- Habit is automatic with little conscious processing: common in frequent behaviours with offer no new experience
- Past behaviour and habit
- Bridge the gap
- research highlights the role of variables such as emotion, commitment and planning that could mediate the intention-behaviour gap
- 2 ways to address this problem...
- Past behaviour and habit
- accounts for 13% of future behaviour
- Can indirectly influence a change in cognition: more common in behaviours that are infrequent
- Habit is automatic with little conscious processing: common in frequent behaviours with offer no new experience
- Past behaviour and habit
- Implementation intentions: simple form of action plans have been well researched and effective. Require you to pan the what and the when of a particular behaviour
Comments
No comments have yet been made