Right Realism (New Right) explanations of crime and deviance

?

1. What are the four controls (Hirschi) and how do we get them and what does it imply?

  • Individualistic, Safety valve, Rebelism - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
  • Attachment, Commitment, Belief, Involvement - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
  • Ritualism, Retreatism, Conformism - Get them as get older so younger peole have less to lose so commit more crime - Imply that youth, ethinic minorities, underclass more criminal as lack controls
1 of 20

Other questions in this quiz

2. What is control theory and who said it?

  • Hirschi - Most people dont commit crime as have four controls in their lives that make the costs of punishment more than rewards (economic and personal gain)
  • Merton - Most people dont commit crime as have four controls in their lives that make the costs of punishment more than rewards (economic and personal gain)
  • Clarke - Most people dont commit crime as have four controls in their lives that make the costs of punishment more than rewards (economic and personal gain)

3. Which Right Realists' explanation is callled 'Broken windows' and why?

  • Jones - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are
  • Wilson - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are
  • Herrnstein - More crime when social control breaks down, incivilities (liter, vandalism) are kept low by others reaction, once that stops serious crime takes over - once one broken window in abandoned building, they all are

4. How does Matthews evidence critise Wilson?

  • Compared zero tolerance programmes with more liberal approaches, found little difference on impact of negoaiting labels
  • Compared zero tolerance programmes with more liberal approaches, found little difference on impact of crime rates
  • Compared zero tolerance programmes with more liberal approaches, found alot of difference on impact of crime rates

5. How does Stan Cohen ciritise Wilson?

  • Argues New Right thinking leads to gender inequalities in victimisation - women live in paranoid forrestresses with security so crime happens by and to men
  • Argues New Right thinking leads to class inequalities in victimisation - rich live in paranoid forrestresses with security so crime displaces to poorer less protected areas
  • Argues Right Realist thinking leads to class inequalities in victimisation - rich live in paranoid forrestresses with security so crime displaces to poorer less protected areas

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Crime and deviance resources »