Random: Sample where researcher choose a target population, a sampling framce and has no pre-planned influence on which person to choose. Every participant has an equal opportunity to be chosen.
Systematic - The researcher has a system for choosing participants from a sampling frame e.g. every 10th name
Quota - Makes the sample representative e.g. differnt cultures, gender etc.
Volunteer/self-selected: Participants who choose themselves to participate. Can filter to get quota sample.
Opportunity: Any group of the target population that is readily available to the researcher
Snowball: Initial group is selected. Sample grows through personal recommendation
1 of 2
Adv. & Disadv. of different types of sampling
Random:
Wider range of participants
Sample size is controlled
May not be representative
Systematic:
Sample size controlled
Reliable
Biased group
May not be representative
Quota:
Divided into groups
Can make sample representative
May be hard to find enough participants to fill the quota
Volunteer/self-selected:
Consent is easy to gain
Gets around alot of ethical issues
All volunteers may have strong views
May not get enough volunteers
May not be representative
Opportunity:
Sample size is controlled
Target group readily available
May not be representative
Snowball:
Participants more likely to give consent
May have skewed responses if participants discuss answers
Comments
No comments have yet been made