INDUSTRIALISATION OF THE USSR
All the key points of the industrilisation of the USSR
- Created by: MeganAndTheHart
- Created on: 29-04-12 14:06
1917
- Russia - had small industrial base in 1914- couldn't compete with West
- Aim: to strengthen country & ensure national security
- Method:
- Encourage industrial investments
- Help privately owned industry
(impose foreign import duties= reduces foreign competition) - Situation:
- Industry and Agriculture= privately owned
- Production dependent on supply and demand
(Above= The most significant differences from Stalinist economy)
Pre-WW1;
- Industry:
- grew at a quicker rate than agriculture
(Russia= agricultural country- accounted for: 3/4 of employment
1/2 of national income - Economy: dependent of Gov. support and foreign investment
- State: encouraged heavy industry
- Special agencies: regulated production & prices (economic planning)
= inefficient! - Conditions: poor = discontent working class
Soviet Economy: 1918-28
- Post-civil War: devasted economy
Instigated NEP= some recovery- still weaknesses - Industrial Production= not sufficient to reach socialism
- Russia:
- No middle class = unlike west
= State had to lead industrialisation- Weak infrastructure = lacking in experience and resources
= weight of state needed for industrialisation
Five Year Plans: Why?
- To strengthen the economy: against hostile foreign powers
- Industrial transformation needed: for a socialist society
- Communist Ideals: all wealth would belong to the people (not capitalists)
'The First Five Year Plans can be seen more as a propaganda device to drive socialist citizens forward and create a sense of urgency'
Sheila Fitzpatrick on the First Five year Plan:
A period in which the "spirit of the Cultural Revolution swept people along"
Industrialisation: How? ... a difficult decision
Bukharin's strategy:
- Invest in Agriculture
=more grain = more grain exports= money for industrial machinery imports
Gov. Advisers:
- Use existing state industry
= Use money to: -Pay for more industry
- Make industry more efficient
=Higher productivity = money for industrial investment
(BUT... NEP heavy industry = inefficient- no surplus profits for investment)
1927-28: Shortage of grain deliveries= forced collectivisation & industrial planning
Industrialisation: previous attempts
- 1926-27:
- Kerch Metallurgical factory:factory construction costs 1928 = more than tripled
= bad decisions were made = money was lost
Gov. needed scapegoats for such problems - manipulated by Stalin!
- Shakty Trial, 1928
- group of engineers (from coal mines) = accused of sabotage and treason
- Central committee; "New forms & new methods of bourgeois counter-
revolution against proletariat dictatorship and...social industrialisation" - 'Bourgeois' specialists were replaced by 'reliable communists' in the drive for industrialisation...
Moving towards Industrialisation...
Stalin:
- Criticised the NEP: "Some communists do not yet properly understand the
technique of production and have yet to learn the art of
management" - Called for the speeding up of industrialisation:
- To provide technology for agriculture= increase efficiency
Sacrificing heavy industry for light industry would make the USSR an "offshoot of the world capitalist economic system"
Gosplan:
- State planning commision
- Directed the drive for industrialisation
Five Year Plans: A new concept...
What?
- Gov. determined: what to be produced & when
- During a five year period
- Plans replaced existing mechanism
When?
- October 1928 (backdated!)
Plan?
- Had insecure data and was overly ambitious
(But was decided later that it should be completed in 4 years!)
Industrialisation: A new concept... (cont.)
Communist state claimed to be:
- "Representing ordinary people's interests rather than the interests of a privileged minority"
Class Warfare:
- Became more and more forceful as industrialisation got under way
Stalin:
- Suspicious of loyalty of party members
- Highlighted class conflict as an important part of industrialisation= purging
- Ignored any political advice- he was now leader
Five Year Plans: In brief
The First: 1928-32:
- Focused on the development of heavy industries (coal, steel etc.)
The Second: 1933-37:
- Focused on consumer goods (but heavy industry remained the 1st priority)
- Built on top of the first plan
The Third: 1938-41:
- Focused on the needs of the defence sector (growing Nazi threat)
- Disrupted by WWII in 1941
These plans formed the basic economic structure of the USSR & lasted until 1991
First Five Year Plan: Successes & Weaknesses (1928
Emphasis:
- Heavy industries ( accounted for 80% of total investment)
Successes:
- Electricity- production trebled
- Coal & Iron - output doubled
- Steel production - increase by 1/3
- Engineering- developed
- New industrial complexes -built (inc. new tractor works)
Weaknesses:
- Decline in consumer industries/goods
- Small workshops- gone
- Chemical targets- not met
- Lack of skilled workers
Second Five Year Plan: Successes & Weaknesses (193
Emphasis:
- Communications -especially railways (Heavy industries still feautured strongly)
Successes:
- Heavy industries benefited from plants
- Electricity production- expanded rapidly
- By 1937- USSR= virtually self-sufficient in machine-making & metal-working
- Transport/communications - grew rapidly
- Chemical industries- growing
- Metallurgy- developed
Weaknesses:
- Consumer industries still lagged (showed small signs of recovery)
- Oil production didn't meet expectations
Third Five Year Plan: Successes & Weaknesses (1938
Emphasis:
- Heavy Industries- in particular ARMAMENTS
Successes:
- Heavy industries continued to grow
- Defence and Armaments - grew rapidly (300% increase in production?)
Weaknesses:
- Steel output- grew insignificantly
- Oil production-failed
- Consumer industries - took a backseat again
- Factory shortages
Cut short by WWII
First Five Year Plans: Problems
- High targets put enormous strain on the economy
- Materials in short supply - intense competition to get hold of them
- Factories competed with each other
- Bribery and Corruption rife- pulled strings to get resources
- Managers made illegal deals to fulfil their targets - hijacked lorries etc
- Planners had not invested enough in rolling stock
- Underproduction in some parts of the economy (due to shortages)
- Overproduction in other parts of economy
- Great deal of wastage: - created parts other industries didn't want
- output was sub-standard (lorry tyres lasted few weeks!) - Few managers admitted there was anything wrong - covered mistakes
- Not all mistakes covered up - Stalin used this as political tool
(Industrial equivalent of kulak= 'bourgeois specialist'- identified as sabateurs who deliberately cased hold-ups etc- believed to be anti-socialist by Party) - Consumer goods industries were sacrificed to the needs of heavy industries
The Second Five Year Plan: Improvements
Second plan improvements:
- Revised
- Targets = scaled back
- More consolidation
- In greater detail/ more organised
- Gave specific targets for enterprises
- Gave estimates of costs, labour, prices etc.
- Investment put into railway = could carry more freight
- New training schemes- encouraged worker to learn skills/techniques
'Three good years': 1934-36- achievements by 1937 = Impressive
Continuation:
- Still shortages, wast and under/over-production issues (smaller scale though!)
The Third Five Year Plan: The good and the bad
Post- 1937 = economic slump:
- Iron & steel stopped growing
- Oil industry failed = fuel crisis
- Resources channelled into armaments= shortages elsewhere
- Purges in full swing- economy deprived of valuable personnel
- planners also purged = chaotic system
However:
- By 1941, USSR had industrial base for a powerful arms industry
- Plans allowed USSR to be victorious in WWII
'Quicksand' Society
New workers:
- Almost 1/2 labour force by the end of the 1st FYP = peasants
- moved from countryside- bewildered and looking for work, lodgings, food - Phenomenal turnover of labour - average worker moved jobs 3 times p/a
- Peasants often lacked disciplines of time-keeping and punctuality
- Found it difficult to adapt to the monotony of machine-based work
- High rate of absenteeism
- Skills were a premium- many lacked ability to work machines properly
- Managers: competed for skilled workers by offering higher wages/ perks
- Estimated less than 7% of workforce were skilled
= lots of machinery damage
= poor quality of products
Stakhanov...
Who? When? What?
- Alexei Stakhanov - pneumatic pick operator
- 10 o' clock - 30th August 1935
- Began his special shift
- After 5 hours, he had cut 102 tons of coal = 16 X average of around 6.5 tons
Why? How?
- Idea of part organiser- Konstantin Petrov- at Central Ormino
- Central Ormino lagged behind its quota- Petrov wanted to do something...
- He knew Stakhanov was one of the best
- Ideal Conditions were set up and haulier were on hand to take the coal away
Next... The Stakhanovite Movement
Two hours later:
- Petrov assembled a party committee- Stakhanov was acclaimed for his world record for productivity
- Stakhanov received 200 roubles (normally 30), an apartment with a telephone and comfortable furniture, tickets for the cinema, performances and a holiday
- His name was put on the mine's honour board
The Result:
- Sectional competition were set up- miners demanded the chance to beat the record (2 did by the 5th September) - the result the party wanted!
- Ordzhinikidze (commissar for Heavy industry) had Stakhanov, the 'Soviet Hercules' put on the front cover of Pravda. He said:
"In our country, under socialism, heroes of labour must become the most famous" ...The term "Stakhanovite Movement wass used. - Stalin called for Stakhanovitism to spread "widely and deeply" across the entire Soviet Union.
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Why are young men so different than before? »
- English A Level Coursework »
- History edexcel communism russia and china »
- English Literature EPQ Title »
- History A levels »
- Just Chatting »
- Clash of ideologies A2 CCEA 2024 exam »
- Alevel History Coursework help!! »
- OCR A-Level History Unit 2 (Y201-Y224) - 13th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- Which country has the best literature? »
Comments
No comments have yet been made