TB6 D&L Lecture 4; How do we use language?

?
  • Created by: mint75
  • Created on: 04-01-16 15:02
What is the difference between indirect and direct speech acts?
Direct speech acts (approx 10% of lang) intend the literal meaning. Indirect speech acts (approx 90% lang) move beyond the literal meaning
1 of 13
What is extracted first in Searles two stage model of understanding indirect speech?
Literal
2 of 13
How do one stage models of understanding indirect speech work?
Extraction either parallel literal and non-literal, or ONLY non-literal. Depends on context AND type of indirect speech.
3 of 13
What is fictive motion?
Figurative language which implies movement
4 of 13
What methodology can be used to measure fictive motion?
Eye tracking
5 of 13
What did Richardson & Matlock find in a study of fictive motion?
Fictive motion affected looking time to the relevent path, fictive motion had an effect on sentence processing. The literal meaning was activated regardless
6 of 13
What was the hypothesis in Richardson & Matlock (2007)?
If fictive motion is a part of sentence understanding, FM sentences with hard terrain should have a longer LT
7 of 13
What was the main finding of a study by ferreria et al (2005) in avoiding ambiguity?
Pps aimed to establish common ground in both conditions, but ESPECIALLY for non-linguistic ambiguity
8 of 13
What was the main finding of Keysar et al (2000)?
Although there was a representation of common ground, pps initial response was often egocentric, suggesting inhibition
9 of 13
In a study by Wu & Keysar (2007), which cultural group found it easier to suppress the egocentric POV and make fewer fixations towards wrong objects?
Collectivist (Chinese)
10 of 13
Tanenhaus et al (1995) "put the apple on the towel into..." Which condition has the least ambiguity?
Two referent condition; abides by quantity maxim
11 of 13
What did the study by Tanenhaus et al (1995) suggest?
Because visual context influences the liklihood of being garden-pathed, evidence AGAINST the autonomy/modularity of the parser.
12 of 13
In a visual-world eye tracking study by Altmann&Kamide, (1999), when did anticipatory fixations due to verb-selectional restraints occur?
Well before the onset of the noun, suggesting that language understanding involves prediction
13 of 13

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What is extracted first in Searles two stage model of understanding indirect speech?

Back

Literal

Card 3

Front

How do one stage models of understanding indirect speech work?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What is fictive motion?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

What methodology can be used to measure fictive motion?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all TB7 D&L resources »