Psychology Perception

?
sensation vs perception
s= info. from the world around us that we receive through our sense organs: physical stimulation of sense receptors by environment.
p= how we organise interpret&make sense of the sensory info. from world
1 of 45
Ponzo illusion
example of a misinterpreted d.c.
converging lines= give impression of distance, higher lines look longer bc. its further away

apply size constancy= mentally enlarges it, makes top look bigger than bottom
2 of 45
Muller-Lyer Illusion
misinterpreted depth cues
perceived outgoing lines to be further away, incoming line close. we unconsciously scale up line w. outward fins as it's further= must be longer
3 of 45
Rubin's vase
Ambiguous figure. Both correct= brain cannot decide which to pick
4 of 45
Ames room
1 person appears gigantic in comparison to other. shape of room not square= trapezoid. Back wall slopes back= mdc
5 of 45
what is visual constancies
ability to see object the same even if actual image received has changed
6 of 45
height in plane
distant objects seen/shown higher in visual field in relationship to items that are nearer= look smaller
7 of 45
relative size
larger objects in visual field appear closer than smaller objects= similar size, appear smaller= relative size different= perceive further away
8 of 45
occlusion
when an object covers part of another= appears to be closer
9 of 45
linear perspective
when parallel lines appear to converge in the distance= further away object= the more a line converges
10 of 45
retinal disparity
difference between the sensory info. received through each eye which is the result of slightly angles they have of the world
11 of 45
convergence
depth perception that uses the extent to which eye muscles have to work, in order to focus on images/objects
12 of 45
size constancy
a tendency/inclination to perceive an object as being the same size, regardless of whether it is nearby or far away
13 of 45
fiction
when an object/colour/movement is perceived but the construction is not actually there.
14 of 45
kanizsa triangle
appears 2 triangles , 1 overlapping the 1st, but 2nd triangle is not there, brain adds it in

the shape suggests a contour that isn't there= illusory contour
15 of 45
Direct Theory of Perception
Gibson
bottom up theory
-everything we need to perceive stimuli accurately is already within environment sensation=perception, perceptual abilities= innate
affordances= property of object defines possible uses
16 of 45
continued
optic array= everything we see at only 1 time
motion parallax= mdc, closer objects in visual field seem to move more than further away in v.f.
optic flow patterns= let brain know we are moving
17 of 45
evaluation
P) struggles to explain perceptual errors E) visual illusions good example of when brain makes perceptual errors E) theory says all info needed is received by retina but visual illusions= this is inaccurate L) inability to explain v.i.= weakness= lacks cr
18 of 45
evaluation
P) G+walk visual cliff experiment supports theory E) Babies in study would not go to deep end, remain in shallow E) as babies were young, it is unlikely they had learnt this L) supports G's idea that parts of human perception is innate
19 of 45
Constructivist theory
Gregory=nurture
inference= world= ambiguous. Brains interpret/infer from our sensory experiences. educated guess/ fill in gaps
perceptual hypothesis= use most probable explanation for visual info. received
mistaken hypothesis= brain has drawn wrong conclu
20 of 45
evaluation
P= research show cultural differences in perception E) many studies found ppl. in diff. parts of world interpret v.c. diff. E) their diff. experiences have affected perception= what learnt= important part of what we see= nurture helps us understand world
21 of 45
evaluation
P) cannot explain perceptual abilities at birth E) G's idea of mh has been useful in understanding how v.i. work. E) However artificial task 2D images are designed to fool us. not tell us much abt. perception irl L) GT may be better= explains everyday pe
22 of 45
Perceptual set + culture aim, IV, DV, ED, sample, control
Hudson
aim= to investigate if ppl. from diff. cultures interpret d.c. in pics diff.

IV= skled/ unskled/ race
DV= could perceive depth or not
ED= ig
Sample= skled, unskled, race
control= same 3 q's asked
23 of 45
procedure
1) shown pic of man pointing spear at antelope and elephant
2) pp. asked what do u see? what is the man doing? which is nearer...?
24 of 45
results
1. skled pp. perceived depth more than unskled pp.
2. white skled pp. perceived depth more than black skled pp.
25 of 45
conclusion
results suggest cultural differences affect p.s. bc. ppl. from diff. cultural use diff. d.c diff. when perceiving 2D drawing

learnt ability and racial division
26 of 45
evaluation
P) methodological issues when investigating culture E) language barriers E) creates issues of understanding / translation of procedure L) validity decreased= communication issues
27 of 45
evaluation
P) artificial tasks E) H asked whether pp. perceived depth by showing pic E) irl, don't judge depth/distance by pics L) may not be investigating everyday perception= reduces how applicable to irl
28 of 45
PS and emotion aim, IV, DV, ED, sample, control
McGinnies
aim= to investigate whether things that cause anxiety are less likely to be noticed than things that don't (longer recognition and saying)
IV= words offensive/neutral
DV= how long to say words/emotional arousal
RM=l
ED=rm
sample=8m+f psych stude
29 of 45
results
1) longer to recognise and say taboo words than neutral
2) offensive words= bigger emotional arousal than neutral words
30 of 45
conclusion
emotion does influence ps, our brains use perceptual defence to protect us from offensive words by temporarily blocking them out
31 of 45
evaluation
P) used objective measure of emotion E) many studies are limited= based on self report methods= influenced by opinion=bias E) used scientific method= galvanic skin response which pp. can't influence L) results less likely to have been affected by bias= in
32 of 45
evaluation
P) relayed recognition of taboo words= embarrassment >defence E) M said delay= perceptual defence E) may have instead been bc. felt uncomfortable saying words (time period)= conc. incorrect L) embarrassment= ev.= reduces credibility
33 of 45
Ps and motivation aim, IV, DV, ED, sample, control
Gilchrist and Nesberg
aim= to investigate what effect food deprivation has on perception of food-related pics
IV=whether food deprived or not
DV=how pps adjusted light
RM=l
ED=ig
Sample= 26 undergraduates+control
control=shown same 4slides for 15s ethics=
34 of 45
procedure
1) show 4 slides for 15s (T-bone steak, fried chicken, hamburgers, spaghetti)
2) projector turned off
3) turned back on, but dimmer
4) pp. had to adjust light to o.g.
35 of 45
results
those food deprived adjusted light brighter than b4, control group did not
36 of 45
conclusion
motivation affects ps. Hunger can be a motivating factor that affects perception
37 of 45
evaluation
P) similar results in other studies found E) when pps f-d for 4hrs and shown a.f.= more likely to perceive as food E) motivation can affect ps as suggested L) increases credibility= studies have similar results
38 of 45
evaluation
P) aspects of study not like irl E) pps asked to judge pics of food= artificial task and adjust brightness E) not something done irl, better if judged real food L) study may not explain how motivation affects everyday ps= can't be generalised
39 of 45
Ps and expectation aim, IV, DV, ED, sample, control
aim= to investigate whether pps interpretation of an a.f. was affected by context in which it was shown
IV= whether pps shown ABCor 12,13,14
DV= what pps reported a.f. as
RM=l
ED=ig
Sample=24
control=a.f
40 of 45
procedure
1) pps shown part of figure
2) either shown top-to-bottom (nos) or left to right (letters)
3) had to report and draw a.f. in middle
41 of 45
results
1) if saw letters= reported a.f. as B
if saw nos= reported a.f. as 13
42 of 45
conclusion
expectation does influence ps as you have been cognitively primed to anticipate something
43 of 45
evaluation
P) artificial task used E) use a.f= designed to trick pps into making errors E) occasional come across irl, such situations are rare L) have little to tall us abt. everyday perception
44 of 45
evaluation
P) used ig design= problem of individual differences E) pp in 1 group may have been diff to pp in other groups who's name began w. letter B in letter group E) more likely to perceive a.f as B than other pps L) problem of pvs may have affected conc.
45 of 45

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Ponzo illusion

Back

example of a misinterpreted d.c.
converging lines= give impression of distance, higher lines look longer bc. its further away

apply size constancy= mentally enlarges it, makes top look bigger than bottom

Card 3

Front

Muller-Lyer Illusion

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Rubin's vase

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Ames room

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Perception resources »