In terms of reliability, Milgram's research was...
STRONG- repeated and retested easy- standardised procedure- each test the same i.e Mr Wallace picked the learner. Also repeated study with women strengthening reliability
1 of 5
In terms of validity, Milgram's study is...
WEAK- lacked mundane realism- i.e wouldn't be asked to punish someone via electrocution in everyday life
2 of 5
In terms of sampling, Milgram's study was...
WEAK- because there was gender bias (all male) and there was culture bias (all from New Haven)
3 of 5
In terms of data, Milgram's study was...
STRONG- quantitative- comparisons with students (0-3% to full shock compared to the 65% of the experiment) Qualitative- 3 people had seizures- depth and detail
4 of 5
In terms of ethics, Milgram's study was...
PROBLEMATIC- didn't realise they were actually shocking someone (deceived) but, they were debriefed afterwards
5 of 5
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
In terms of validity, Milgram's study is...
Back
WEAK- lacked mundane realism- i.e wouldn't be asked to punish someone via electrocution in everyday life
Comments
No comments have yet been made