Psychology paper 1 social influence

?
Replication milligram support
Tomasz Gryzb (2017)- 90% obedience- temp val and pop val
1 of 11
Strength Milgram situational variables
Bickman (1974)
2 of 11
Strength milgram cultural variations
Miranda et al (1981)
3 of 11
Criticsms milligram pps knew procedure was fake
Orne and Holland
4 of 11
War crimes- agentic state
Adolf Eichmann
5 of 11
Agentic state- milgram video
Blass and Schmidt (2001)
6 of 11
Agentic state criticism
Milgram- not all pps obeyed. Holding et al (1966) nurses didn’t experience moral strain when handing responsibility to doc even though they recognized their role in the destructive process
7 of 11
Legitimacy of with strength, Milgram cultural variations
Kilburn and Mann (1974)
8 of 11
Authoritarian personality f scale
Adorno et al (1950)
9 of 11
Support for auth personality- interviews. Third factor- correlation
Elms and Milgram (1966) fully obedient pps high on f-scale. Lower level of education- Hymann and Sheatsley (1954)
10 of 11
Critiques f scale
Greenstein (1969) “a comedy of methodological errors”
11 of 11

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Strength Milgram situational variables

Back

Bickman (1974)

Card 3

Front

Strength milgram cultural variations

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Criticsms milligram pps knew procedure was fake

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

War crimes- agentic state

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Obedience resources »