Critical Thinking Definitions
Match the definition to the appropriate word.
- Created by: Kristina Radonic
- Created on: 06-04-09 11:43
| N | M | A | M | K | L | V | D | I | H | A | R | O | J | N | Y | D | B | T | A | G |
| V | Y | P | J | U | C | N | O | Q | E | Y | Q | B | E | F | T | A | W | U | P | E |
| A | M | P | R | R | A | O | V | C | A | K | X | N | J | T | I | P | X | Q | S | S |
| N | P | E | U | F | I | I | Q | U | R | L | E | I | L | I | R | P | O | R | D | J |
| O | X | A | H | D | M | T | K | I | S | O | Y | T | I | N | O | E | W | I | V | B |
| I | N | L | X | L | T | I | I | W | A | I | R | U | W | C | H | A | R | S | B | Q |
| T | C | T | U | X | L | D | F | V | Y | C | M | Q | R | O | T | L | M | E | C | E |
| O | F | O | F | T | R | A | B | O | B | V | G | U | Y | N | U | T | Q | W | P | J |
| M | Y | H | N | N | Q | R | D | L | G | Y | H | O | N | S | A | O | A | C | Y | U |
| E | L | I | A | X | C | T | K | T | N | A | D | Q | B | I | O | P | M | G | L | X |
| O | B | S | O | M | U | O | D | C | L | J | A | U | C | S | T | O | T | F | X | U |
| T | K | T | N | F | H | T | G | A | A | V | I | E | F | T | L | P | W | J | Y | K |
| L | K | O | E | B | J | L | J | D | E | E | A | Q | D | E | A | U | J | L | S | Y |
| A | X | R | V | R | B | A | I | T | P | E | K | E | L | N | E | L | F | G | N | B |
| E | D | Y | P | F | E | E | T | A | P | U | R | B | J | C | P | A | W | D | T | F |
| P | Q | I | R | I | W | P | D | H | A | O | O | J | M | Y | P | R | C | I | R | V |
| P | Q | M | U | A | B | P | Y | U | W | O | A | Q | S | O | A | I | T | V | Q | M |
| A | H | C | L | Q | U | A | F | G | J | P | A | X | Y | B | W | T | K | W | D | L |
| L | V | F | R | F | K | A | M | E | Y | K | T | L | S | D | Q | Y | G | F | V | X |
| V | A | U | W | M | V | L | H | H | E | P | L | Q | S | L | L | H | E | R | D | Y |
| P | G | I | N | B | X | C | F | Q | M | B | C | F | B | B | L | U | L | D | I | N |
Clues
- 23. When evidence or an argument contains two claims which cannot both be correct at the same time. (13)
- 38. A fault in the pattern of reasoning that weakens the support given to the conclusion of an argument. (4)
- 38. A reference to something or someone in order to persuade an audience to accept a conclusion. (6)
- 39. A form of argument that attempts to support a conclusion by engaging the audience’s emotions rather than giving reasons. (6, 2, 7)
- 39. A form of argument that supports a conclusion by saying it has always been done in this way. (6, 2, 9)
- 39. A form of argument which justifies a conclusion by how much it is accepted. (6, 2, 10)
- 39. Referring to an expert, witness or recognised authority to support a claim. (6, 2, 9)
- 40. A form of argument that supports a prediction about the future with reference to the past. (6, 2, 7)
- An attempt to justify an action on the basis that someone else is doing it. (2, 6)
- Evidence based on second-hand information from another source, who may have interpreted it. (7)
Comments
No comments have yet been made