1. Who supported Money & Erdhardt's claim that a child can change sex without any psychological harm?
- Mazur et al - 5 Individuals Genetically male, but raised as females - even though acted slightly male still well ajusted
- Mazur et al - 4 individuals Genetically male, but raised female - Had male behaviour but still well ajusted
- Mckillip et al - 5 Individuals Genetically female but raised males - Well adjusted just with female tendences
1 of 10
Other questions in this quiz
2. In which case was Nature stronger than Nurture? (Money 1974)
- John/ Joan - Even though socialised as a girl and then re-socialised as a male = Psychological harm caused suicide
- John/Jenny - Even though socialised as a Male and then re-socialised as a male still had psychological harm
3. Why can't these theories by generalised to all humans?
- As they do not take into account all factors that determine gender
- As they are case studies
- As they are only observations
4. What does Smith and Lloyds theory suggest about the colour of the babies clothes?
- Which toys the child plays with indicates to the parents which gender the child is (Colour of clothes makes no difference)
- How the child is labelled ( Through the colour clothing) determines how the child is socialised (Which toys)
- How the child acts towards the parents determines the gender given
5. Why is this theory retrospective?
- As they are case studies and era dependant
- As they are open to interpretation
- As they are observations and case studies only
Similar Psychology resources: