1. What did Bahrick and Watson find?
- Studied Downs syndrome children vs autistic children and found ToM not related to IQ
- 3yr/o look in box (incorrect) and 4 yr/o look in basket (correct)
- 6-12 mth/o = thought someone was in the mirror, 13-24 mths looked curious and 24+ recognised themselves
- 5mth olds knew what their legs were doing, showing they had subjective self awareness
- 19% of 15mths touch nose compared to 66% of 25mths
1 of 20
Other questions in this quiz
2. What did Selman study and what are his stages?
- Conceptual perspective taking, 1)UP, 2) SIP 3) SRP 4) TPP 5)SP
- perceptual perspective taking, 1)UP, 2) SIP 3) SRP 4) TPP 5)SP
- Imitation, 1)Intentions, 2)Language aquistion 3)TOM
- Intentions 1)UP, 2) SIP 3) SRP 4) TPP 5)SP
3. What are the A02 studies for development of children's understanding of others
- Carpenter, Hughes, Hobson, Eide and Eide
- Hughes, Hobson, Eide and Eide, Ballegeon and DeVos
- Carpenter, Hughes, Hobson, McGarrigle and Donaldson
- Carpenter, Hughes, Hobson, Eide and Eide, Walster et al
4. What did Carmichael find?
- Chimps showed cognitive development, challenging Vygotsky
- Ppts shown drawing with 1 of 2 labels. Drawn differently depending on label. Showing language is important
- - Children performed better on complex puzzle tasks with scaffolding than alone
- children who couldn’t conserve, taught comparative language but didn't improve
- Papua New Guinea- basic counting system- limited cognitive development
5. What did Ballergeon and DeVos find?
- Carrot study, babies aged 6 months, showed object permenance (challenging the ages of the stages)
- Mountain study, only at aged 7 were children not egocentric
- Police/naughty boy study, 90% success rate at aged 3.5-5 suggesting that Piaget underestimated abilities
- Suggested children didn't understand the conservation task because they couldn't apply context to it so they introduced 'naughty teddy' and there was a 70% success rate of 4-6 year olds