Critical Thinking; AS Level Unit 2 - Flaws in Reasoning

Flaws in reasoning

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Lalala
  • Created on: 10-01-11 21:40

Appeal to Authority

Claiming your conclusion must be right because an expert or someone in authority supports it. 

1 of 14

Appeal to Popularity

A form of argument which justifies a conclusion by its popularity

E.g. Most people are in favour of capital punishment, so the government should bring it back.

2 of 14

Appeal to Tradition

A form of argument which supports a conclusion by saying it's tradition.

E.g. 'We've always left weak infants on the mountainside to die, so we should carry on doing it - it's our tradition.'

3 of 14

Appeal to History

A form of argument which supports a conclusion by reference to history.

E.g. 'I've always passed exams without putting much effort in, so I'll breeze through my A-levels too.'

4 of 14

Two wrongs don't make a right

An attempt to justify one harmful thing on the basis of another, different, harmful thing.

5 of 14

Tu Quoque

An attempt to justify an action on the basis that someone else is doing it

E.g. My friends are going, why can't I?

6 of 14


Drawing a general conclusion from specific evidence.

7 of 14

Restricting the options

Pretending a false and limited version of the choices available to encourage a particular course of action.

8 of 14

Flaw of Causation

A flaw in reasoning which assumes that if two things occur together or in quick succession, one of them must cause the other.

However, there may not be enough to infer a casual link.

9 of 14

Slippery Slope

Reasoning from one minor event through a series of unlinked events to an extreme consequence.

10 of 14

Circular argument

an argument that starts and ends with the same point.

11 of 14

Confusing necessary and sufficient conditions

Reasoning which confuses necessary and sufficient conditions does not support a conclusion.  Something which is necessary is not always enough.  Something which is enough is not always necessary.

12 of 14

Attacking the arguer

Attacking the person putting forward an argument rather than their argument.

13 of 14

Straw person

Dismissing a distorted version of an opposing argument.

14 of 14


No comments have yet been made

Similar Critical Thinking resources:

See all Critical Thinking resources »