Collectivisation

Collectivisation 1928-41

?
  • Created by: Charlotte
  • Created on: 06-05-08 18:25

Why Did the Communists Think Collectivisation Was

> Larger units of land could be farmed more efficiently due to mechanised agriculture and Machine and Tractor Stations (MTS)

> It would be easier for the state to procure the grain - there would be fewer collection points

> Mechanised agriculture would require far fewer peasants, opening them up for work in other fields

> Experts would help peasants to farm in more modern ways, which would result in higher food production

> Collectivisation was the socialist solution to agriculture. It would socialise the peasantry, as a socialist state couldn't be built with so many private landholders.

> They would live in socialist 'agrotowns' - working and living together comunally, eating in restaurants, visiting gyms/libraries etc

1 of 14

Why Did Stalin Collectivise?

> Farming methods were not productive enough - couldn't support industrialisation

> 1928 - Russia exported 1/4 of the grain it had done in 1913

> Lenin's 'Red Peace Land' had produced few poor quality goods due to subsistent farming, inefficient

> Grain procurement failed under the NEP

> Peasant and governmental conflict could undermine the Plans (bad relationship since civil war)

2 of 14

Living Conditions

SOVKHOZ - Owned and run by the state. Peasants paid a regular wage like factory workers

KOLKHOZ - All land held in common, run by an elected committee, farmed as one unit. Each household allowed its own private plot - could grow vegetables/keep animals

The aim of collectivisation was to create more sovkhozes, but the kolkhozes with private lots became the most favoured by the Communists

3 of 14

Why Was Collectivisation Carried Out So Rapidly?

> A Russian peasant would aspire to raise their status to 'kulak' without this label

> This did not comply with Communist ideology - individual wealth was not an option

> It was difficult for Bolsheviks to persuade illiterate peasants - they could not be drawn in by the propaganda posters/understand intellectual ideas

4 of 14

The Myth of the Kulak

> That collectivisation was voluntary and not enforced

> Stalin claimed kulaks were holding back the workers revolution, and labelled them enemies working against the interests of the government and the people

> The kulaks were actually industrious and were used as a scapegoat for the inefficiency of Soviet agriculture

5 of 14

What Did Stalin Do to Popularise Collectivisation?

> Campaigned through propaganda, provided moral grounds for onslaught on the kulaks

> Dekulakisation carried out - land and property seized from the minority of better off peasants who were attacked, arrested, deported etc organised by OGPU - anti kulak squads

> By the end of the 1930s, almost all of the peasantry had been collectivised

6 of 14

Consequences of Collectivisation 1

> Peasants disorientated and alienated - would/could not cooperate in the destruction of their lifestyle, majority slaughtered their livestock and ate their produce; no harvest/animals to rear

> Soviet authorities responded with imprisonment, execution, deportation

> Party members ('The Twenty Five Thousand') sent to increase food production levels yet added to the disruption, only available grain being exported

> A major purpose of the grain recquisition squads was to maintain adequate supplies in the industrial regions - misery in the countryside proportionally greater (urban areas had more food)

> 1932-3 national famine - many peasants stopped producing due to inability to perform or desperate resistance

> Migration from rural to urban areas was so great that an internal passport system was set up

7 of 14

Consequences of Collectivisation 2

> The 'Twenty Five Thousanders' had no real knowledge of how to organise or run a collective farm, but waged class warfare

> Dekulakisation carried out by each region, had to find a certain number each day whether they existed or not

> Decree 1st Feb 1930 gave local party organisations the power to organise/run collective farms + use necessary measures against the kulaks

> 10 million deported and sent to labour camps

> Peasantry denounced neighbours to acquire their goods

8 of 14

Summary of Collectivisation 1

> Economic disaster

> Grain harvests dropped dramatically early 1930s when it was most needed, didn't recover to 1928 levels until late 1930s

> Figures were bad compared with Tsarist Russia 1913

> State procurements didn't decline

> State collected grain to feed rapidly growing workforce and to trade abroad to pay for industrial equipment

> Succeeded in its main aim of providing resources for industrialisation

> Labour for new factories provided by peasants moving to urban areas

> Great Depression forced grain prices down - little profit

> Valuable resources had to be diverted to agriculture

9 of 14

Summary of Collectivisation 2

> Human cost horrendous, some ended up in Gulag prison camps

> Approx 10 million peasants dispossessed, 2-3 million died, 5 million in famine

> Huge part of Party's modernisation drive - didn't want private business owners or grain hoarding peasants to control economy

> Using local Soviets and MTS, it established a system of controlling the countryside and making agriculture to serve town + workers

> Politically successful, gained control of villages without bargaining with peasants

10 of 14

Condition of Agriculture 1924

> 80% of population in agricultural sector

> Majority lived in primitive conditions, widespread poverty

> Peasants still used backward methods, old farming techniques

Problems Caused By This:

> Peasants were conservative - Stalin saw this as holding back progress

> Industrial development couldn't progress without sufficient food produce

> The peasant labour force needed to be redirected to industrial areas but couldn't be without more efficient farming

> No surplus to pay for imports

11 of 14

Economic Results of Collectivisation

Successes

> Grain export increased by 5.03 million grammes 1928-31

> Labour for towns - half of population were Magnitogorsk ex peasants

> Increased procurement - 12 million grammes 1928-31

Failures

> Grain harvests dropped dramatically in early 1930s

> Waste of resources - MTS exports

> Animal population declined by nearly100 million

> Didn't earn enough money due to cheap grain prices

12 of 14

Human and Political Results of Collectivisation 1

Political Success

> International prestige - seemed successful during Depression

> Success measured by exports which were increasing, looked as though Communism had triumphed over world economics

> Control over terrified peasants, MTS sent to projects, dekulakisation

> End of the free market; no more NEP/state ownership

13 of 14

Human and Political Results of Collectivisation 2

Human Cost

> Famine - 7 million died

> Destruction of age old socioeconomic system - shattered moral way of life by dekulakisation

> 'One death isa tragedy, a million is a statistic' - Stalin

> 10 million dispossessed peasants - 10 million 1929-32

> 2-3 peasant deaths aside from famine

14 of 14

Comments

albertryce

Report

As an editor from cipd assistance online to me Without empowering the middle and lower middle class it just remains nothing but a dream which can not be materialized a successful, peaceful, flourishing and thriving society financially. Equal approach and rightful distribution of resources is the key which influences in positive way.

hessajoseph

Report

Creative topic it is for discussing but there are also very beneficial and highly rated law coursework helpers in UK available to help criminals act allied at their words reliably.

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all Russia - 19th and 20th century resources »