STAGES OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION


	STAGES OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION
	Advantages CHILDREN WITH MULPTIPLE ATTACHMENTS HAVE AN ADVANTAGE, AS THEY ARE MORE ABLE TO FORM AND CONDUCT SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS. THIS IS BECAUSE THEY AHVE MORE EXPERIENCE OF DOING SO THAN CHILDREN WITHOUT MULTIPLE ATTACHMENTS. THEY ARE FURTHER ADVANTAGED IN THAT IF THEY LOSE AN ATTACHMENT FIGURE THEY HAVE SEVERAL OTHERS TO TURN TO THE COMMON PATTERN OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPEMNT IMPLIES THAT IT IS BIOLOGICALLY CONTROLLED AND HAS EVOLVED. DEVELOPING THE ABILITY TO PREFER THOSE WHO ARE SENSITIVE TO YOUR NEEDS AND BEING WARY OF THOSE WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR WOULD HAVE A SURVIVAL VALUE SCHAFFER AND EMERSON'S STUDY WAS CONDUCTED UNDER REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS, SO THE CONCLUSIONS DRAWN CAN BE SEEN TO HAVE EXTERNAL VALIDITY	Disadvantages SCHAFFER AND EMERSON'S FINDINGS CAME FROM OBSERVATIONS MADE BY THE RESEARCHERS AND THE CHILDREN'S MOTHERS, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY BIAS AND INACCURACIES. THIS WOULD LOWER THE VALIDITY OF CONLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THE STUDY THERE WERE QUITE LARGE INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN WHEN ATTACHMENTS FORMED IN SHCAFFER AND EMERSON'SSTUDY, WHICH CASTS DOUBT ABOUT WHETHER THE PROCESS OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPMENT IS UNDER BIOLOGICAL CONTROL RESEARCH FINDINGS THAT MULTIPLE ATTACHMENTS ARE OF EQUAL QUALITY GOES AGAINST BOWLBY'S IDEA OF MONOTROPY THAT SEES INFANTS AS HAVING ONE PRIME ATTACHMENT, SUPERIOR AND STRONGER TO OTHER SECONDARY ATTACHMENTS
	Evaluation

CHILDREN WITH MULPTIPLE ATTACHMENTS HAVE AN ADVANTAGE, AS THEY ARE MORE ABLE TO FORM AND CONDUCT SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS. THIS IS BECAUSE THEY AHVE MORE EXPERIENCE OF DOING SO THAN CHILDREN WITHOUT MULTIPLE ATTACHMENTS. THEY ARE FURTHER ADVANTAGED IN THAT IF THEY LOSE AN ATTACHMENT FIGURE THEY HAVE SEVERAL OTHERS TO TURN TO
THE COMMON PATTERN OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPEMNT IMPLIES THAT IT IS BIOLOGICALLY CONTROLLED AND HAS EVOLVED. DEVELOPING THE ABILITY TO PREFER THOSE WHO ARE SENSITIVE TO YOUR NEEDS AND BEING WARY OF THOSE WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR WOULD HAVE A SURVIVAL VALUE
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON'S STUDY WAS CONDUCTED UNDER REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS, SO THE CONCLUSIONS DRAWN CAN BE SEEN TO HAVE EXTERNAL VALIDITY

SCHAFFER AND EMERSON'S FINDINGS CAME FROM OBSERVATIONS MADE BY THE RESEARCHERS AND THE CHILDREN'S MOTHERS, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY BIAS AND INACCURACIES. THIS WOULD LOWER THE VALIDITY OF CONLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THE STUDY
THERE WERE QUITE LARGE INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN WHEN ATTACHMENTS FORMED IN SHCAFFER AND EMERSON'SSTUDY, WHICH CASTS DOUBT ABOUT WHETHER THE PROCESS OF ATTACHMENT DEVELOPMENT IS UNDER BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
RESEARCH FINDINGS THAT MULTIPLE ATTACHMENTS ARE OF EQUAL QUALITY GOES AGAINST BOWLBY'S IDEA OF MONOTROPY THAT SEES INFANTS AS HAVING ONE PRIME ATTACHMENT, SUPERIOR AND STRONGER TO OTHER SECONDARY ATTACHMENTS

Get Revising