|
- Teachers had the own image
of the “ideal pupil”, the upper middle class pupil best fitted the
description given by the teachers.
- Argues that deviant labels where given before and deviant acts took place and these are ascribed by more powerful members of society to those in the lower classes.
- Pupils would act on the labels given to them - a self-fulfilling prophecy.
- Pupils behaviours influenced the way teachers interacted with them, the time given by the teachers was also often linked to child's attainment.
|
- Assumes
teachers won’t change their opinion and labelling of a pupil over time as
they get to know them better.
- Some of the label given may be true creating a stereotype ( e.g. a “naughty“ child is a lower class child).
- Ignores the fact the children can change their behaviour from deviant to conforming quickly.
- David Hargreaves' study (“Social Relations in a Secondary School”) indicates much
the same kind of things (in an English school) as Becker observed in American schools
some thirty years before.
|
Comments
No comments have yet been made