Asch's research on conformity
- Created by: whomshallIfear99
- Created on: 23-09-15 15:31
View mindmap
- Asch's research into conformity (1951)
- AIM: To investigate the degree to which a person would conform to a majority decision that is clearly wrong
- PROCEDURE: 123 US male participants took part in a line judgement test. Groups of 7/8, confederates with one naïve participant, 18 different trials, 12 critical trials, naïve participant answered second to last.
- FINDINGS: The naïve participant gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time. 25% of the participants did not conform on any of the trials, 75% conformed at least once
- CONCLUSION: People's judgements are influenced by the majority, however there are some individual differences.
- FINDINGS: The naïve participant gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time. 25% of the participants did not conform on any of the trials, 75% conformed at least once
- PROCEDURE: 123 US male participants took part in a line judgement test. Groups of 7/8, confederates with one naïve participant, 18 different trials, 12 critical trials, naïve participant answered second to last.
- Weaknesses
- Can't be generalised, only male uni students in 1950s
- Only one participant used in each trial so is costly and time consuming = not repeatable.
- Demand characteristics could have played a part
- It is an artificial situation so is not applicable as it lacks mundane realism
- Rate of conformity is only 32% on critical trials
- Strengths
- In the control group the rate of error was 0.04% (3 out of 720) Shows how obvious the correct answers are
- It is valid
- The participants were debriefed to avoid deception
- Variations
- GROUP SIZE: With less than 3 confederates the majority is not sufficient for influence to be exerted, but there is no need for a majority of more than three
- UNAMITY: The presence of a dissenting confederate led to reduced conformity, whether the dissenter was giving the right or wrong answer. On average conformity was 25%. The presence of a dissenter enabled the naïve participant to behave more independantly
- TASK DIFFICULTY: Conformity levels increased due to informative social influence as the answer was more ambiguous.
- AIM: To investigate the degree to which a person would conform to a majority decision that is clearly wrong
Comments
No comments have yet been made