Reconstructive Memory Flashcards

?
  • Created by: tomtom11
  • Created on: 29-05-17 15:07
Reconstructive Memory STRENGTH- Bartlett (1932)/War of the Ghosts
Showed 20 students a Native American Ghost Story. It was unfamiliar. Shortened the story from 330 to 180 words. Confabulated details (canoes to boats). Rationalised the story (ghost battle was just a battle) He asked recall over hours, days, to years
1 of 6
Reconstructive Memory STRENGTH- Allport and Postman (1947)
Showed a picture of an argument between a well-dressed black character and a scruffy white character. After serial reproduction, many people then described the appearances being the other way around. Some even said that black character had a knife.
2 of 6
Reconstructive Memory STRENGTH- Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Participants watched a car crash and then given a questionnaire with a question like "how fast were the cars going when they hit"? They recalled 34mph, but those who had the verb "smashed" recalled 40.8mph.
3 of 6
Reconstructive Memory STRENGTH of application
Can help to explain the inaccuracy of EWT and make DNA testing more reliable.
4 of 6
Reconstructive Memory WEAKNESS of Scientific Credibility
Early studies by Bartlett were in no way scientific. He didn't follow standardised procedures and didn't have a specific scoring system. Bartlett's only measure was counting the words recalled. Thus, his findings were subjective.
5 of 6
Reconstructive Memory WEAKNESS of Bartlett (1932)
Getting Cambridge Students to recite a Native American Ghost Study is fairly unrealistic and lacks ecological validity.
6 of 6

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Showed a picture of an argument between a well-dressed black character and a scruffy white character. After serial reproduction, many people then described the appearances being the other way around. Some even said that black character had a knife.

Back

Reconstructive Memory STRENGTH- Allport and Postman (1947)

Card 3

Front

Participants watched a car crash and then given a questionnaire with a question like "how fast were the cars going when they hit"? They recalled 34mph, but those who had the verb "smashed" recalled 40.8mph.

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

Can help to explain the inaccuracy of EWT and make DNA testing more reliable.

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

Early studies by Bartlett were in no way scientific. He didn't follow standardised procedures and didn't have a specific scoring system. Bartlett's only measure was counting the words recalled. Thus, his findings were subjective.

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Cognitive Psychology resources »