Critical Thinking
Flaws
- Created by: Viv Leong
- Created on: 16-05-13 15:29
| Q | Q | Y | J | F | C | M | J | C | A | H | W | A | F | C | S | U | Y | V | N | I |
| Q | S | S | I | K | I | D | S | V | D | R | W | S | B | N | M | H | L | V | W | S |
| Y | X | Y | D | B | R | B | O | P | H | O | O | O | G | C | S | A | U | R | H | X |
| O | B | B | G | U | C | I | R | P | O | O | E | R | J | D | Q | S | E | N | T | R |
| L | J | Q | R | O | U | S | R | R | M | U | F | C | E | T | E | T | N | Q | J | N |
| U | Y | S | X | X | L | F | Y | X | I | P | K | D | Q | X | S | Y | P | M | O | J |
| E | O | S | L | V | A | U | X | L | N | Y | Y | U | F | S | Y | G | R | Y | N | C |
| F | B | R | L | E | R | S | T | C | E | Y | Y | D | U | L | M | E | A | B | A | O |
| N | L | F | N | J | A | K | N | O | M | P | Q | U | K | I | T | N | J | R | L | U |
| W | Q | K | X | X | R | Y | O | N | S | F | V | V | K | P | X | E | G | Y | C | H |
| J | M | M | E | Y | G | U | Q | F | C | E | D | A | B | P | C | R | Q | B | N | C |
| I | A | T | F | K | U | M | F | L | Y | N | Y | P | N | E | V | A | A | F | O | M |
| T | M | J | T | X | M | B | H | A | E | G | H | R | B | R | E | L | O | U | U | R |
| K | W | U | U | A | E | Y | U | T | G | D | K | R | Q | Y | O | I | E | Q | T | I |
| T | Q | X | Q | V | N | T | R | I | A | M | B | O | D | S | X | S | J | O | R | O |
| A | O | C | U | E | T | K | A | O | L | W | Y | V | U | L | A | A | Q | C | C | S |
| Y | D | V | O | J | V | J | V | N | N | T | Y | A | N | O | A | T | Y | T | R | B |
| J | V | W | Q | Y | A | Q | L | F | W | X | J | L | O | P | G | I | R | N | Q | V |
| G | A | F | U | S | O | S | Y | K | A | W | C | J | L | E | S | O | T | A | P | H |
| V | D | L | E | L | N | T | X | G | U | X | S | C | D | D | X | N | X | L | U | A |
| P | J | T | O | M | I | Y | H | I | C | U | T | B | I | I | O | I | C | F | P | W |
Clues
- "You too"; an attempt to justify an action on the basis that someone else is doing it (2, 6)
- Attacking the arguer, not the argument; a form of reasoning which criticises the arguer's features so that the reader will dismiss his argument (2, 7)
- Bringing two different concepts together and treating them like two similar situations; confusion between the terms and the conclusion might fail (10)
- One of the reasons is the same as the conclusion and the argument does not lead anywhere or decide anything (8, 8)
- Reasons from one possibility through a series of events that are not properly or logically linked - EXTREME CONSEQUENCE (8, 5)
- To draw a general conclusion from insufficient from insufficient evidence (5, 14)
Comments
No comments have yet been made