CCT UNit 2 terms

?
D A T X I E T D Y M A C F A W S U B D O Y
X V Y M D C D C I J R G D M R Y G H Y E N
I S L A N O R K N A I E D B V R G U C M L
B B J Y D N S O F I F N L I I E R I N K V
B H R U Y T Q Y E V Y E N G C G S N E U E
W L A S R R P J R M I R O U B S D T T B G
Y K Y M R A T Y E K P A X I P W R B S L Q
A E B W S D I X N Q O L G T B R P K I N I
H X R G D I G D C V K P X Y V C C A S Q W
A E O Q L C G Y E J U R U O I W T N N L U
N F A I E T S T F U I I M H D F M L O F Q
A B C V X I M S S N K N X H T O C G C J W
L N K P R O N R D A C C L P F B F R N M A
O L F A P N I V N M O I C D H S W U I V Y
G P I F B S B P S Q V P A N E F M S I D I
I N I M V V B Y W W F L W X U J Y B U T O
E J S H U N H J I H W E T W V E Y B O R Y
S B H J B O D H G Y H S A N R N I E H L T
R O B M M X L Y I B I D B O H Q I P Y Q D
U I D W L B U U S J T E U X H N K Q H B W
X W H C O B D Q I M E V U P P L D Q S Y F

Clues

  • A form of arguement which use parrallels between similar situations to persaude the audience to accept a conclusion. They suggest that situations are significantly similar and work the same way (9)
  • A general rule like statement which applies beyond te immediate circumstances and acts as a guide to action. They may be used in an arguement as reasons, conclusions or assumptions (7, 10)
  • A special form of inconsistencies. Ideas or facts which are contradictory say exactly the opposite things (14)
  • A word or phrase that is ambiguous if it can have more than one meaning and its not clear which meaning is intended ina particular context (9)
  • Another name for the process of looking at the next logical step. If you can draw a conclusion from some reasoning, you can say that the conclusion follows from the reasoning. (9)
  • Inconsistent parts of the argument cannot both be the case at the same time, or they would support different conclusions (13)

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Critical Thinking resources:

See all Critical Thinking resources »