1. What are the 3 studies used to evaluate the biosocial explanations of gender dysphoria?
- Chung and Coate, Walster and Walster
- Chung et al, Zucker et al, Coate et al
- Chung et al, Zucker et al, Walster et al
- Cole, Miller et al, Zucker et al
1 of 20
Other questions in this quiz
2. What studies are used to evaluate the role of genes/hormones on gender development?
- Swaag, Diamond, Little Hans, Reiner and Gearhart
- Reiner and Gearhart, David Riemer, Little Hans
- Reiner and Gearhart, David Riemer, Diamond, Swaab
- Little Albert, David Riemer, Diamond, Swaab
3. What did Thompson et al find?
- That the ages Kohlberg proposed are incorrect
- 2 years olds were 70% correct in identifying gender compared to 90% of 3 year olds, showing improvement with age
- Only at 3-4 do children realise gender is constant over time and those who answered correctly showed greatest interest in same sex models
- Children under 5 identified a doll as a girl depite it having genitals on show
4. What did Swaab find?
- A case study of a boy who has his penis burn't off and was converted into a female, however he later returned to male
- 14 (XY) males with cloacal extrophy were assigned females at birth but despite this, all were mascualine and 8/14 reversed to male
- The size of the SDN is 2x larger in males than females and in MtF transsexuals had the SDN size of a woman
- Testosterone was injected into rats and the girl babies born were both physically and mentally mascualine
5. What did the Stangor and Rubie research find?
- Gender schema and gender constancy are simply different stages
- Kids under 4 showed no gender constancy but strong sterotypes, suggesting Kohlberg's theory is wrong and the gender schema theory is right
- Kids under the age of 6 recalled more consistent pictures than gender inconsistent pictures
- Schemas are important shown by children aged 4-9 given toys labelled either girl or boy toys and children payed most intention to their in-group