Religious Language - Symbol and Myth
- Created by: Megan Puplett
- Created on: 02-06-13 20:55
Fullscreen
Religious language as symbolic
- The poppy functions as a powerful symbol.
- The poppy is not just something to remind us of the horrors of past conflicrs, in the way that a road sign reminds us which town is ahead.
- The poppy has become part of Rememberance Day.
- It has come to represent it in a deep way.
- Tillich - religious language ought to be understood in a similar way.
- Religious statements are symbolic but nevertheless cognitive statements.
- A symbol 'participates in that to which it points'.
- For example a flag is symbolic of the nation it represents and in a way it participates in the power and dignity of the nation it represents.
- So we are able to learn something of God, but out words become symbolic rather than literal.
- We are familiar with religious symbols such as the cross or the bread and wine of communion.
- What Tillich is suggesting is that even statements such as 'God is good' are symbolic rather than literal.
- Tillich suggests that symbols in religion function a little like our appreciation of the arts.
- A good peice of music or a painting may in Tillich's words 'create symbols for a reality which cannot be reached in any other way.
- Symbols like the arts work on a deep and powerful level.
- A symbol unlocks something within out ground of being', and suggests that this is the only non-symbolic statement that can be made about God.
- Tillich views symvbols as having both positive and negative aspects.
- Because words cannot adequatley describe God, their meaning is always 'partially negated by that to which they point'.
- However there is a positive aspect of the symbol participating in that to which it point which makes Tillich's view a credible alternative to analogy.
- There have been a number of criticisms of Tillich's views:
- Tillich's ideas can be seen as a little vague prompting some thinkers such as J.H.Randell to agree…
Comments
No comments have yet been made