B) Religious language as non-cognitive and mythical
- Created by: Gradebaker
- Created on: 12-05-19 20:28
Fullscreen
Complex form of mythical language
- Peter Vardy (in 'religious language & virtue ethics') observed that the same ideas and values are communicated in myths from all different cultures
- Myths preserve and hand on the cultural identity of a group, in story form
- Myths are retellable and easier to communicate (than, perhaps, a philosophical theory)
- Myths communicate the identity, experience and values of a community; they are not concerned with the literal truth of the story
- Religious myths may point to or reveal something about God (like symbols do)
- Attempts were made to demythologise (remove mythological elements and imagery and reveal eternal truths or values) myths in the 19th and 20th century. E.g. Rudolph Bultmann with the New Testament
- Ultimately demythologisation was not successful; myths are significant because they communicate values and beliefs in story form. Therefore, difficult to separate truths as they are expressed through the story
Creation myths
- Mythology has tremendous significance in religious traditions
- In this context, myths are textual versions of earlier oral traditions where fundamental questions of meaning, purpose or value were explored in a pre-scientific and pre-historical setting
- Myths reflect explorations of fundamental concerns about human destiny
- In the setting of theological discussions or the study of religion, a myth is a story or narrative which may have some basis of truth in history, but the historical accuracy or details are…
Comments
No comments have yet been made