Relationship essay plans
- Created by: leila.s
- Created on: 04-06-16 09:04
Fullscreen
FORMATION OF RELATIONSHIPS - PART ONE
Main Assumption
- The similarity theory suggests that relationship formation is based on the amount of similarities between two people. There are two stages to this theory and two key features; personality and attitude.
AO1 - Similarity Theory
- Step one sort out people that have dissimilarities, step two sort remaining potential partners by looking at attitudes and personality traits.
- People with similar personality traits and attitudes are more attracted to each other
- Attitude alignment occurs
AO2 - Supporting Research: Leher + Geher
- Lab experiment of attitude similarity and mutual liking
- Given descriptions of strangers (some with similarities)
- Results show people who had similar attitudes were mutually attracted
AO3- Methodological Criticism
- Lab experiment so lacks ecological validity
- Self report method increases chances of social desirability
- Cant be generalised and may be untruthful so lowers validity
AO2 - Limitation
- The dissimilarity repulsion hypothesis by Rosenbaum said dissimilarities are more important
- Initial attraction fades when dissimilarities are found
- Limits the similarity theory as its not completely accurate
FORMATION OF RELATIONSHIPS - PART TWO
Main assumption
- The reward/need theory is a behaviourists approach to explain the formation of relationships. It is best described as a learning process and has two main components; classical and operant conditioning.
A01 - Reward/Need Theory
- Operant conditioning (direct reinforcement)
- suggests there are different consequences
- Classical conditioning (indirect reinforcement)
- learning through association with events or moods
AO2 - Research Support: Griffit + Guay
- participants did a creative task and rate how much they liked the experimenter
- the people who were praised by the experimenter rated them higher (evidence for operant)
- also rated an onlooker highly (evidence for classical)
AO3 - Limitation
- This focuses on receiving rewards more than giving
- Hays found that giving reward is also ‘rewarding’
AO2 - Research Support: Aron et al
- people measured high romantic love on a self report questionnaire
- These people also showed strong dopamine activity
IDA- Reductionist
- Has simplified relationships and broken it down into two suggestions
- May be other factors such as evolutionary explanations (fundamental goal is to reproduce)
- Limits the theory of formation of relationships
BREAKDOWN OF RELATIONSHIPS - Part One
Main Assumption
- Duck and Rollie suggested there are several reasons for breakdown and there is also a stage process of a relationship break down.
AO1 - Ducks Reasons for Breakdown
- lack of social skills, lack off stimulation, maintenance difficulties
- lack of social skill: poor conversation so cannot portray feelings
- lack of stimulation: relationship is going different directions
- maintenance difficulties: long distance
AO2 - Conflicting Research: Rohlfing
- Suggested that this is historically bias (maintenance difficulties)
- 70% of people in the study had been in a long distance relationship and 90% had long distance friendship
- Additionally, Holt and Sone found there is little dissatisfaction if there is regular contact
AO2 - Research support: Boekout et al.
- Found that lack of stimulation or social skills may be an influence on extramarital affaires
- Asked undergraduates to rate emotional and sexual reasons to have an affaire
- sexual reasons more likely…
Comments
No comments have yet been made