Util and Kant Response to Environmental Ethics
- Created by: etaylor0206
- Created on: 16-06-15 17:59
Fullscreen
- Utilitarianism:
- Hedonic calculus in separate situations (quantitative, Bentham)
- Worth noting Mill considered enjoyment and study of nature top of list of higher pleasures so preservation of environment would be important.
- Singer - Pref util. Gives example of electric dam over gorge - good as it creates employment and is an energy source but bad as would destroy habitats and a good hiking location etc.
- considers interest of all sentient creatures
- lays particular interest on future generations (their preferences matter too)
- In general utilitarianism should consider future gens. for example burning fossil fuels might benefit people today but the negative effects of future gens (global warming etc.) would far outweigh todays pleasures.
- plants have no intrinsic worth as they are not sentient
- May be able to argue preserving rainforests etc. so long as it sentient beings' welfare is maximised in some way.
- Singer gives hierarchy of values - humans at top, being most sentient…
Comments
No comments have yet been made