Samuel and Bryant

HideShow resource information

Samuel and Bryant

Samuel and Bryant

                    Critical of Piaget's experiment of conservation as children were                   more likley to give wrong answer when question asked twice.

1 of 6

Participants

Participants 

  • 225 boys and girls 
  • variety of schools in devon
  • 4 groups by age = (5years + 3 months/  6years + 3 months/  7years + 3 months/  8years + 3 months)
  • Subdivided into 3 groups of 21
2 of 6

Method

Method 

  • 3 independent variables = 1. type of questionin
  • Lab experiment

3 experimental conditions =

  •  1. standard (same as Piaget)
  • One judgement (asked after)
  • Fixed array (children shown after transformation)
  • 84 children in each condition (good comparison of age)
  • Children only tested in one condition but tested 3 times on= counters for number/  Plasticine for mass/  Liquid in glass for volume
3 of 6

Results

Results 

Variable 1 - type of questioning:

  • All age groups made fewer errors in the one-judgement condition
  • Fixed array condition = highest number of errors

Variable 2 - age: 

  • Older children = fewer mistakes 

Variable 3 - type of task:

  • children made fewer errors on conservation of mass task and most erros on conservation of volume 
4 of 6

Conclusion

Conclusion 

  • Hypothesis that children make more mistakes when asked question twice is supported
  • Piaget was not entirely negated 
  • Childrens conservation skills improve with age and conservatiomn of number is easier than other 2 tasks 
5 of 6

Evaluation

Evaluation 

Strengths:

  • high levels of control
  • reduced order effects by independent measures design 

Weaknesses:

  • Lack of ecological validity 
  • individualk differences

Uses

  • Implications for teaching of children and in child psychology 
6 of 6

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Core studies resources »