Epistemology Revision Notes: Perception

These are my personal revision notes on Perception for AQA AS level Philosophy. (They are set out using speech bubbles, pictures and a great deal of colour-coding because I find this helps me remember stuff). I've made them by directly following the specification for exams from 2015 onwards.

These notes cover direct realism and problems with it (e.g. perceptual variation), indirect realism and how it can lead to scepticism and idealism. 

I hope they are helpful for people! (I'll upload notes for other units once I've made them.)

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: BethD
  • Created on: 18-03-15 20:22

Pages in this set

Page 1

Preview of page 1
Journey through


Page 2

Preview of page 2
How do we perceive things? What is it that we perceive and how does it relate to the real world?
What are the immediate objects of perception?
How can we define knowledge?
What is the ultimate source of knowledge- reason or experience?
Criticism 1: But what about
perceptual variation

Page 3

Preview of page 3
How could our perception of objects be altered if there was no intermediate substance to be
altered? If we perceive an object itself, it seems unlikely that this perception could differ from the
object in any way.
In the `pencil in a glass of water' illusion, what we perceive directly…

Page 4

Preview of page 4
What with the illusion, hallucination, perceptual variation and time lag arguments, I'm not so sure
about direct realism now... Could you tell me more about what
indirect realismis?
Indirect realism is the theory that the immediate objects of our perception are mind-dependent
objects that are caused by and represent mind-independent…

Page 5

Preview of page 5
Response 1: There is a lack of perceptual choice surrounding our experiences. For example, when
I look up at a cloudy sky, I have no control over what I see. I may will myself to see a purple sky,
but this does not alter the grey colour that I perceive.…

Page 6

Preview of page 6
Besides, even if there is a mind-independent physical world, seeing as we never perceive it, how
can I determine to what extent the real world resembles what I perceive (my sense-data)? We
have no way to externally compare our sensations to real physical objects and so we cannot see

Page 7

Preview of page 7
Wow! That seems like a very radical theory! How on earth can youjustifythe belief that the real
world doesn't exist independent of minds?
Ok, so when you take a sceptical approach , indirect realism seems a bit shaky. But what other
theories are there about
I came up…

Page 8

Preview of page 8
But a thought is not the same as its contents. The thought of an unperceived tree may not exist,
but this has no bearing on whether an actual physical unperceived tree can exist.

It is impossibleto think of an object existing as mind-independent and unperceived by anyone.
You may, for…

Page 9

Preview of page 9
The ideas in God's mind exist as a part of his understanding, rather than as perceptions. God
understands the concept of pain , so he can put it into our minds without feeling it Himself.

Issue 3 with Idealism: It cannot secure objective space and time. For there to be…

Page 10

Preview of page 10
between hallucinations and perception is that ideas in perception originate in the mind of God,
but hallucinations do not. This is a difference in kind.
But both of these criteria mark a difference in degree , whilst the difference between
hallucinations and perception is a difference in kind .




This is great, thank you so much for this!

Similar Philosophy resources:

See all Philosophy resources »