|
Advantages
- P = Research evidence demonstrates the importance of consistency.
- E = Moscovici et al. found a consistent minority view had more impact on other people than an inconsistent one.
- E = This shows that it is important to be consistent with a minority view, as it makes it more likely it will have an effect on the majority.
- L = Therefore, consistency is a major factor in minority influence.
- ...
- P = Research supports the involvement of internalisation in minority influence.
- E = Moscovici varied his study, so participants privately wrote down their answers instead. This increased agreement with the minority.
- E = This shows internalisation occurred but members of the majority had been reluctant to admit their conversion aloud.
- L = Therefore, people may be influenced by the minority but will not admit it, so it's not apparent to the public.
- ...
|
Disadvantages
- P = Research involves artificial tasks.
- E = Moscovici's task was identifying the colour of a slide, which is not a way in which the minority would need to influence a majority.
- E = The findings, therefore, lack external validity, limiting what they tell us about minority influence.
- L = This means we cannot prove the influence of the minority in real life.
|
Comments
No comments have yet been made