EXPLORER'S OR BOYS- STEVEN MORRIS pr.1

?
  • Created by: Sia Med
  • Created on: 01-12-20 11:19

OVERVIEW OF EXTRACT (PAF)

Role

  • PURPOSE: ENTERTAIN/INFORM
  • AUDIENCE: ADULTS/YOUNG ADULTS
  • FORM: NEWSPAPER ARTICLE: EDITORIAL (EXPRESSIVE OF THE AUTHORS POV.
  • TONE (DERISIVE)                 SATIRICAL- "Trusty helicopter"                                                                      SARCASTIC - "bottoms kicked"
  • CONTEXT: 2 British explorers went on a FAILED expedition,                                          Where their helicopter crashed in Antarctica,  then having to be rescued.
  • LAYOUT: SHORT PARA (COMAPCTED W/ INFO) - ECONOMICAL WRITING STYLE.
  • 1ST PARA- REFERENCE TO PAST FALIURE.                                                 THEN: QUICKLY PROVIDES 5W'S  + BACKROUND INFO  (QUOTATIONS)
  • ------------------------------------------------------------------
  • (STRUCTURE POINT 1:) EMMBEDED CLAUSES- BREAKS INFO UP,                                            SOPHISTICALED/CONTROLLED=CREDIBILITY.
  • MIX OF INFORMAL/FORMAL LANG- "FARCE" - INC ACCESSIBILITY TO A RANGE OF AUDIENCES.
  • (STRUCTURE POINT 2 ): NARRATIVE CHANGE "Both men are experienced adventurers..."
  • SEEMINGLY HAS A CELEBRATORY TONE HOWEVER...                               IT'S INTRODUCED OFFHANDEDLY / MIDDLE OF EXTRACT                                        = SEEMS DISINGENUOUS.
  • PREPOSITIONAL CHOICE : "Despite"
  • Undermines their success as EA / credibility                                                At this point, W/strongly reinforced narrative of boys, an attempt to paint them postively is disengenous
  • "CLAIMS" - Diminished credibility / respectability.
  • (STRUCTURE POINT 3) SENTENCE OF STRUCTURE < "SHE SAID; HE SAID.." )
  • CHOICE OF PRONOUNS                                                                                   SUBSTITUTION OF THEIR NAMES                                                                  PARRELED STRUCTURE/ REPETITION                                                        Quite imitative of childish rhyme subtly underscores the immature/ child-like  depiction/ Characterization of the men.
  • TITLE :EXPLORERS OR BOYS MESSING ABOUT ? EITHERWAY TAXPAYER FOOTS THE BILL."
  • ????????Rhetorical question- ???????
  • The title is posed as a question  for the readers to consider throughout the magazine~~~~~~~~~~~                                                    illusion (balanced/unbiasednarrative) Seemingly allows readers to decide which narrative seems most befitting.
  • CONJUNTIONAL PHRASE: "Either way"
  • Either way the readers choose to look at it, they will likely be brought to a negative conclusion. (really only ONE WAY to view this.
  • ULTIMATLEY, answers the rhetorical question and revels the authors biases, as he influences the readers to take on a biased view of the men before the article begins .
  • JUXAPOSITION - "CONFLICTING IMAGES OF BOYS/ EXPLORERS
  • "EXPLORERS"(noun) - Carries positive social connotations, perhaps leading the readers to visualise esteemed individuals like Columbus/Marco Polo
  • "BOYS" - (noun) - Infantilizes the otherwise professional explorers, instantly reduces the professionalism of the men and therefore their credibility , ultimately pushes the authors POV as the more reliable/credible/informed one.
  • -------------------------------------------------------------------
  • NOUN "TAXPAYERS" - Attracts target audiences/
  • The author politicises the article which arguably increases reader engagement with it as they have now been drawn into the narrative , the outcome of the article will directly effect them.
  • DEF wants to stimulate outrage, as taxes increase the public concern over where their going increases, arguably the author utilises this concern to generate outrage/engagement/attention. Readers have personal stake in this . Taxes could have went to public education/ healthcare system ext.
  • -------------------------------------------------------------------

Development (Growth & change)

Other information              

Comments

No comments have yet been made