compare hazards management cycle to parks model

Created by: roseb00d
Created on: 02-07-22 15:23


	compare hazards management cycle to parks model
	Similarities both can be used by a government in order to put together a management plane both do not take into account the economic status of the country / region both do not account for aid both have several set stages	Differences Park model is linear the hazard management cycle is nonlinear The park model has 5 stages, predisaster, disaster, relied, rehab and reconstruct the Park model cannot be used as effectively for chronic hazards the park model illustrates how the quality of life can be impacted by a hazard, the range of management strategies that can be used over time, the importance of emergency relief agencies and rehabilitation and how different areas may have different curves based on economic development and the preparedness the hazard management cycle is qualitative and the Park model is quantitative the hazard management cycle has 4 stages, mitigation, preparation, response, recovery the hazard management cycle is more generic the hazard management cycle focuses on the 4 ps and rs- protection, prevention, preparation,prediction recovery, response, rehabilitation, reconstruction the hazard management cycle puts a bigger spotlight of the before stages of the hazard with the two stages : mitigation and preparing
	Overall comparison in conclusion both cycles are aimed at disaster management - reducing the potential losses from hazards and assuring prompt and appropriate assistance to victims of disaster to achieve effective recovery. However the hazard management cycle is a generic management strategy for governing bodies to develop their strategies from and the Park model 1991 is a graph from which governments can see the effectiveness of their strategies and how multiple hazard strategies must be used at different stages.

compare hazards management cycle to parks model

Similarities

both can be used by a government in order to put together a management plane
both do not take into account the economic status of the country / region
both do not account for aid
both have several set stages

Differences

Park model is linear the hazard management cycle is nonlinear
The park model has 5 stages, predisaster, disaster, relied, rehab and reconstruct
the Park model cannot be used as effectively for chronic hazards
the park model illustrates how the quality of life can be impacted by a hazard, the range of management strategies that can be used over time, the importance of emergency relief agencies and rehabilitation and how different areas may have different curves based on economic development and the preparedness
the hazard management cycle is qualitative and the Park model is quantitative
the hazard management cycle has 4 stages, mitigation, preparation, response, recovery
the hazard management cycle is more generic
the hazard management cycle focuses on the 4 ps and rs- protection, prevention, preparation,prediction recovery, response, rehabilitation, reconstruction
the hazard management cycle puts a bigger spotlight of the before stages of the hazard with the two stages : mitigation and preparing

Overall comparison

in conclusion both cycles are aimed at disaster management - reducing the potential losses from hazards and assuring prompt and appropriate assistance to victims of disaster to achieve effective recovery. However the hazard management cycle is a generic management strategy for governing bodies to develop their strategies from and the Park model 1991 is a graph from which governments can see the effectiveness of their strategies and how multiple hazard strategies must be used at different stages.

Get Revising

compare hazards management cycle to parks model