Why was the Rump dissolved in 1653?

?
  • Created by: eshabains
  • Created on: 09-05-22 16:47
View mindmap
  • Why was the Rump dissolved in 1653?
    • Cromwell and the army had become frustrated with it
      • The army (particularly the Levellers) called for reform but the Rump failed to deliver. Especially because the Rump did not appear to be planning an election.
        • August 1652 - Army attempted to set a day on which the Rumo should be dissolved and a re-election should take place. Cromwell convinced them to hold off.
      • Cromwell had. wanted godly reforms to be made and the Rump had not delivered.
      • Heselridge had been preparing to remove Cromwell as Commander-in-Chief of the army.
    • The Rump was too slow to reform the law
      • The Hale Commission was set up in 1651 to investigate problems within the law. However, lawyers within the Rump prevented these recommendations from being enacted.
    • There had not been enough religious reform
      • Although there was some moderate religious reform, it was not nearly enough for the religiously radical Independents who wanted no formal church structure.
      • Cromwell's chaplain John Owen proposed a scheme that promoted religious tolerance and an educated clergy but it was rejected.
      • The Blasphemy Act (1650) was designed to squash religious radical groups but small ones were still active.
      • Only 4 people had been executed under the Adultery Act (1650).
    • The Rump was self-interested and tries to preserve its power.
      • The Rump was due to re-election as the members had originally been apart of the Long Parliament (est.Nov 1640). But the Rump showed no intention of dissolving and holding an election.
        • The Rump wanted to disband the army because it was a threat and wanted radical reform that the conservative members were unwilling to oblige.
    • The Rump was unpopular amongst the public
      • The Rump was made up of all the MPs that voted in favour of Charles' execution which the general public were appalled by.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all British monarchy - Tudors and Stuarts resources »