Types of attachment + cultural variations
- Created by: __Jess
- Created on: 25-03-23 16:15
View mindmap
- Types of attachment
- Cultural variations
- Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
- UK
- 1 study
- 75% secure
- 1 study
- USA
- 18 studies
- 65% secure
- 18 studies
- Netherlands
- 4 studies
- 67% secure
- 4 studies
- Germany
- 3 studies
- 35% insecure avoidant
- 3 studies
- Japan
- 2 studies
- 27% insecure resistant
- 2 studies
- Israel
- 2 studies
- 29% insecure resistant
- 2 studies
- China
- 1 study
- 50% secure
- 1 study
- Sweden
- 1 study
- 74% secure
- 1 study
- UK
- Evaluation
- Strengths
- High validity
- Indigenous researchers
- High validity
- Weaknesses
- Confounding variables
- Eg. poverty
- Imposed etic
- Confounding variables
- Strengths
- Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
- Ainsworth
- Procedure of the strange situation
- Controlled observation through a two-way mirror
- 7 episodes which last 3 minutes
- Behaviours to judge attachment:
- Proximity seeking
- Exploration and secure base behaviour
- Stranger anxiety
- Separation anxiety
- Response to reunion
- Findings (types of attachment)
- Secure
- Moderate proximity seeking
- Moderate exploration and secure base
- Moderate stranger anxiety
- Moderate separation anxiety
- Easily comforted upon reunion
- Insecure avoidant
- Low proximity seeking
- High exploration
- Low stranger anxiety
- Low separation anxiety
- Doesn't care about reunion
- Insecure resistant
- High proximity seeking
- Low exploration
- High stranger anxiety
- High separation anxiety
- Resist comfort upon reunion
- Secure
- Evaluation
- Strengths
- High predictive validity
- High inter-rater reliability
- Bick et al
- Weaknesses
- Culture bias
- Strengths
- Procedure of the strange situation
- Cultural variations
Comments
No comments have yet been made