levine

?
  • Created by: Tia Neary
  • Created on: 08-02-23 12:49
View mindmap
  • Levine
    • findings
      • most helpful
        • 2. San Jose, Costa Rica
        • 1. Rio de janeiro, Brazil
        • 3. Lilongwe, Malawi
        • 4. Calcutta, India
        • 5.  Vienna, Austria
      • least helpful
        • 1. New York City,United States of America
        • 2.Singapore, Malaysia
        • 3.Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • 4. Sofia, Bulgaria
        • 5,Taipei, China
      • Significant Negative correlation: Lower economic productivity Higher overall helping?
      • Insignificant Negative correlation: Greater walking speed Less likely to offer help
      • Correlations between economic status and overall helping showed that Simpatia countries (Latin American countries and Spain) are more likely to help than non-simpatia
      • Economic productivity was positively correlated with individualismEconomic productivity was negatively correlated with walking speed i.e. faster pace had stronger economic productivityIndividualism was also negatively correlated with walking speed i.e. faster pace were more individualistic.
    • conclusion
      • The helping of strangers is a cross-culturally meaningful characteristic of a place.
      • There are large cross-cultural variations in helping rates
      • Helping across cultures is inversely related to a country’s economic productivity.
      • Helping across cultures is inversely related to a country’s economic productivity.
      • Although faster cities tend to be less helpful than slower cities, the link between economic health and helping is not a by-product of a fast pace of life in a uent societies.
      • The value of collectivism-individualism is unrelated to helping behaviours.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Core studies resources »