Economic Change in Russia (1855-1914)
- Created by: sweethoneypops
- Created on: 29-03-19 18:31
View mindmap
- 1855
- 1862-78
- 1887
- Ivan Vyshnegradsky
- -Prohibitive tariff of 30% on the value of raw materials to boost home production
- Negotiated loans e.g with the French
- 1881-1891 grain exports increased by 18%
- This was at the expense of the peasants- their grain requisitioned by the State.
- "We ourselves shall not eat, but we shall export"
- Great Famine, 1891-1892. 17/39 provinces impacted. over 350,000 died due to diseases e.g. cholera and starvation
- "We ourselves shall not eat, but we shall export"
- 1880: 3 million tons of coal, 1890: 6 million tons
- This was at the expense of the peasants- their grain requisitioned by the State.
- 1881-1891 grain exports increased by 18%
- 1892
- Sergei Witte
- 1895- 280 million roubles of foreign investment VS only 98 million in 1880.
- Expansion of the railway network due to help from the West
- Railway trackage virtually doubled.
- By 1897 Russia was the world's 4th largest industrial economy.
- Introduction of a new rouble, backed up by the value of gold in 1897 to increase foreign investment
- By early 20th century, State controlled 70% of Russia's railways
- 1903-1913- the government received more than 25% of its income from its industrial investments.
- Railways
- By 1905, Russia had 60,000 km of railways + 66% was state owned.
- This helped to stimulate iron and coal industries. Gov. made money from passenger fares and freight charges.
- By 1913 Russia had the second largest railway network in the world with 62,000 km but USA had over 400,000 km.
- This helped to stimulate iron and coal industries. Gov. made money from passenger fares and freight charges.
- Heavy Industry
- Donbass region supplied 87% of Russian coal by 1913 (refer to textbook for stats.)
- Expansion of the PUTILOV IRON WORKS.
- By 1905, Russia had 60,000 km of railways + 66% was state owned.
- 1906
- Pyotr Stolypin
- BEFORE
- Farming was small-scale, peasants tied to their mirs, heavily taxed by the State.
- Average holding fell from 35 acres in 1877 to 28 in 1905. The initiative from 1896 to sponsor emigration settlements to Siberia failed to alleviate pressure on resources.
- Traditional agricultural practices still continued e.g. solcha was still use: wastefully left fallow land each year.
- Lack of husbandry deprived soil of manure.
- Some kulaks emerged as a result of Emancipation
- AFTER
- Although in 1903 he initiated a programme where the mir's responsibility to pay taxes for the peasants was removed, it wasn't till after 1905 that this occurred.
- 1906: PEASANTS GRANTED EQUAL RIGHTS IN LOCAL ADMIN.
- By 1914, 90% of peasant holdings still in traditional strips
- BEFORE
- Pyotr Stolypin
- Sergei Witte
- Overall increase in agricultural production due the kulaks responding positively to Vyshnegradsky's export drive.
- The average peasant had less than 4 hectares.
- Nobles Land Bank (1882) came BEFORE Peasant Land Banks (1885)
- These helped facilitate land purchase but the loans often merely increased debts,
- Nobles Land Bank (1882) came BEFORE Peasant Land Banks (1885)
- The average peasant had less than 4 hectares.
- Ivan Vyshnegradsky
- Mikhail von Reutern
- -Treasury was reformed + new way of collecting taxes -Tax farming was abolished -STATE BANK established in 1860.
- -Government subsidies offered to enable private entrepreneurs to develop railways -Foreign investment in Russia was encouraged
- Forced tax farmers to look elsewhere to invest + there was an encouraging of enterprise
- -Treasury was reformed + new way of collecting taxes -Tax farming was abolished -STATE BANK established in 1860.
- OVERALL: 6% annual growth during von Reutern's time in office.
- BUT 1/3 of expediture went to paying debts and the Russian currency was subject to wild variations in its value.
- 66% of gov. revenue came from indirect taxation which kept the peasants poor.
- BUT 1/3 of expediture went to paying debts and the Russian currency was subject to wild variations in its value.
- Forced tax farmers to look elsewhere to invest + there was an encouraging of enterprise
- 1887
- It was a SERF-BASED ECONOMY
- -Being a serf based economy LIMITED FORCES WHICH DROVE CHANGE e.g. entrepreneurs
- -Serfs were poor, managed to survive on the produce they grew and they starved in the winter.
- Markets DID EXIST but business was small-scale. -Vodka, tools and salt were what they mainly bought.
- Money was not the main form of payment- EXCHANGES IN KIND
- This meant there was NO INTERNAL MARKET DEMAND
- Money was not the main form of payment- EXCHANGES IN KIND
- -Landowners: they were uninterested in how efficiently their estates operated
- No opportunity for CAPITAL ACCUMULATION and no use in seeking money because it was of little use anyway.
- 1862-78
Comments
No comments have yet been made