4.6 - The moral argument

  • Created by: Strelly22
  • Created on: 31-07-19 08:56
View mindmap
  • 4.6 - The moral argument
    • Our human sense of right and wrong makes it reasonable to believe that God exists
    • Cardinal John Newman
      • Linked sense of guilt when do wrong to voice of God speaking through conscience
      • God enabled each person to know right from wrong
      • People can choose to ignore conscience as have free will
      • God's voice within us was a reminder we were responsible to him
      • If God didn't exist, then humans have no sense of right and wrong
    • Immanuel Kant
      • Humans are aware of what they should do in a moral dilemma. Have a duty to do the right thing
      • Recognised that people may not always be rewarded in this life when do good
      • Argued that in order to be fair, God must exist so can be rewarded
      • Claimed that believing in God and justice after death is only reason live morally good lives in this life
    • John Hick
      • Linked behaviour in this life to our existence after death
      • Humans had to make decisions about what is right
      • Suffering and evil were opportunities to learn and act in a way that would best please God
        • People become more like God. Continues after death, so each person continues on their journey to goodness
    • Some reject as doesn't fit with belief of God judging people after death
    • Christians believe that moral behaviour will impact on God's judgement of people - Parable of the Sheep and Goats
    • Christians believe that by listening to conscience and guided by Holy Spirit, they are more able to make decisions, and live lives that will be judged better by God

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Religious Studies resources:

See all Religious Studies resources »See all The Existence of God resources »