unit 2 revision
- Created by: aslaw
- Created on: 31-03-17 10:21
A | C | D | O | J | E | C | F | P | X | V | P | P | D | U | J | X | B | K | Q | G |
F | L | O | O | D | G | A | T | E | S | A | R | G | U | M | E | N | T | N | G | O |
Q | W | I | G | E | N | U | I | N | E | R | E | M | O | R | S | E | G | A | Q | N |
L | G | O | X | M | M | V | D | H | W | R | C | G | K | S | C | Q | N | H | J | C |
C | S | M | A | T | Q | W | K | D | T | R | N | E | R | K | L | U | H | P | P | U |
P | O | F | N | L | X | S | U | N | H | E | E | N | E | U | N | G | W | K | D | U |
T | H | S | C | Q | F | J | Q | U | C | C | T | E | Q | N | A | N | Y | V | T | H |
H | L | U | Q | S | S | A | G | O | H | K | N | R | J | N | M | U | B | J | C | R |
I | L | Q | Q | C | Q | J | T | M | D | L | E | A | A | R | E | O | O | B | E | X |
N | O | V | F | R | O | U | H | N | E | E | S | L | V | W | L | Y | P | R | F | F |
S | G | Y | E | O | L | Y | P | O | J | S | D | D | O | Y | B | V | M | L | G | W |
K | L | J | A | W | M | D | X | G | U | S | E | E | L | Y | A | L | P | F | B | I |
U | T | J | F | N | J | Y | P | A | N | N | D | T | B | U | N | L | T | T | U | J |
L | D | V | W | C | H | I | L | W | E | E | N | E | T | J | O | I | Y | J | U | F |
L | R | M | C | O | L | J | R | E | I | S | E | R | V | I | S | H | T | R | B | N |
R | T | E | Q | U | I | N | P | H | V | S | P | R | A | X | A | R | D | U | O | A |
U | J | M | C | R | Q | U | D | T | R | T | S | E | T | R | E | U | H | G | S | B |
L | U | K | N | T | U | B | W | T | N | S | U | N | F | N | R | O | D | C | O | A |
E | W | F | B | E | W | K | K | O | W | V | S | C | Q | B | U | B | B | Q | K | V |
D | E | W | J | E | P | F | R | S | C | S | U | E | P | X | J | L | W | W | T | M |
K | B | M | Q | G | A | C | P | B | K | Y | L | V | B | N | K | E | H | U | K | T |
Clues
- A lower level of mens rea than intention (12)
- argument used by the court to avoid imposing a duty of care (10, 8)
- Defendants are more likely to be acquitted at this court (5, 5)
- In this case, the damage was too remote (3, 5, 5)
- In this case,it was not forseeable that the claimant would suffer harm (8, 1, 5)
- Intended to prevent other potential offenders from committing crime (7, 10)
- mitigating factor that can be taken into account (7, 7)
- Take your victim as you find them (4, 5, 4)
- The test used to determine whether there has been a breach of duty (10, 3)
- Type of custodial sentence (9, 8)
Comments
No comments have yet been made