Home > A Level and IB > Philosophy > Traditonal arguments for God, Religious language/experiences and Good and Evil part 1
Traditonal arguments for God, Religious language/experiences and Good and Evil part 1
0.0 / 5
- Created by: kdog101
- Created on: 25-01-23 15:02
What type of Argument is Design by whom?
Inductive (reason to seek truth), a posteriori (from senses/experiences)by Paley and example of natural theology
1 of 31
What are Paley's promises?
Observation, Regularity, Purpose, Complexity
2 of 31
What else did he say?
Evil allows bringing of good (purpose) and he refers to religious scripture.
3 of 31
Paleys Analogy
Watch maker
4 of 31
What did Hume say?
Paley's analogy undermines Gods divinity
5 of 31
Strengths
God as a designer is simple, Need evil for good to exist, Designer is metaphysical and transcendent
6 of 31
Weaknesses
Evil is an argument against omnipotents and omnibenevolences, we have no universe making experience
7 of 31
What is cosmological argument and by whom?
Inductive, Posteriori, by Aquinas which translates to blueprint (cosmos, logos)
8 of 31
Aquinas' 3 ways
Motion, efficient cause, contingency and necessity
9 of 31
What did he say about God?
Uncaused cause, no infinite regression
10 of 31
Leibniz what was his principle did he agree with Aquinas?
Agrees, principle of sufficient reason- Haven't found reason for the universe within, so must be without.
11 of 31
what did Hume and Russell say?
both say statements about existence are synthetic, not analytic. Russell says good is by chance (metaphysical) universe is contingent e.g. matter
12 of 31
Strengths
Simple, logical, we require full explanations
13 of 31
Weaknesses
Why do we need an explanation, cant assume everything has a cause until we have experienced everything, inconsistent notion of necessary being (uncaused cause)
14 of 31
Augustine theodicy
Sin entered the world from Adam and Eve, we all share it in nature, absence of good, consequence of human action God is just in not stopping it
15 of 31
Augustine how did he define evil?
Privation, something lacking what it should have
16 of 31
Strengths
Values free will, appeals to conservative beliefs of creation and the fall.
17 of 31
Weaknesses
Is it just and loving for God to punish all, Inconsistent Triad (evil exists, God is omnipotent and omnibenevolent), Jesus couldn't control human nature
18 of 31
Irenaeus theodicy
suffering leads to growth, God allows evil so we become his likeness, evil is necessity to appreciate good
19 of 31
Strengths
Evil already exists giving action value
20 of 31
Weaknesses
Suggest everyone goes to Heaven, Challenge isn't always good, some suffer more
21 of 31
Free will Defence
Natural evil gives physical suffering then mentally, Natural and moral evil combine to cause suffering, God gave up control for greater good, Evil needed for free will
22 of 31
First order goods
e.g. happiness can also be reduced to first order evil like sympathy or enhanced with spite
23 of 31
Alin Platinga
No Evil= no value and cant think evil, God didn't rid evil due to limited power, and not compatible with free will if he did rid evil.
24 of 31
Strenghts
God is justified to allow evil to teach us morale responsibility
25 of 31
Weaknesses
Maddie's rejection- Logically possible to only make freely picked good choices- This then questions Gods power, love, existence
26 of 31
Hicks soul making theodicy
Epistemic distance (from knowledge) in order to not be overwhelmed by God, Hell is abhorrent as God is all-loving, we freely choose god and evil is not absence of good otherwise there would nothing to overcome.
27 of 31
Strengths
Evil is matter of degree remove the holocaust and the next worse evil is now worse, The more more morale evil removed the less morale freedom we have.
28 of 31
Weaknesses
Doesn't justify animal suffering, Pain needs to exist to warn of danger, doesn't justify the extent of evil in the world.
29 of 31
Process theology- Alfred North
God is growing/changing, mistranslation god did not call the universe to existence he created order from chaos
30 of 31
Process theology- Griffin
Rejects gods omnipotence, idea God created from nothing implies unlimited power, instead the universe objects had power which opposed God meaning evil is not of God but the Universe. God is panentheistic- the universe is within him/ he is its soul
31 of 31
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What are Paley's promises?
Back
Observation, Regularity, Purpose, Complexity
Card 3
Front
What else did he say?
Back
Card 4
Front
Paleys Analogy
Back
Card 5
Front
What did Hume say?
Back
Related discussions on The Student Room
- OCR A-Level Religious Studies Paper 1 (H573/01) 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- Edexcel A-level Religious Studies Paper 1 (9RS0 01) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 1 (H573/01) - 10th June 2024 [Exam Chat] »
- Eduqas A-level Religious Studies 1 (A120UA0-1-A120UF0-1) & 2 (A120U20-1) [Exam Chat] »
- Edexcel IGCSE RS - The Religious Community Revision »
- how to get top marks OCR A Level Religious Studies »
- A-level Religious Studies Study Group 2022-2023 »
- OCR Religious Studies A Level Predictions »
- AQA A Level Philosophy Paper 1 + 2 (7172/1+2) 18th and 26th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- AQA A-level Religious Studies 1 (7062/1) 12 Jun & 2 (7062/2A-2E) 19 Jun [Exam Chat] »
Similar Philosophy resources:
0.0 / 5
5.0 / 5 based on 3 ratings
5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
4.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
3.0 / 5 based on 5 ratings
Comments
No comments have yet been made