The impact of situational variables 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyConformityA2/A-levelAQA Created by: KatieCreated on: 21-02-20 18:58 Why did Milgram go on to investigate situational variables to allow him to see how they impacted obedience 1 of 28 what 3 situational variables did he investigate proximity, location, uniform 2 of 28 what was the proximity of teacher/learner in the original they were in adjoining rooms so the teacher could hear the learner but not see them 3 of 28 what was different in the proximity variatio they were in the same room 4 of 28 what did obedience drop to in this condition from 65% in the original to 40% 5 of 28 what other ariation on proximity did Milgram try the teacher had to force the learners hand onto an electroshock plate 6 of 28 what was the obedience rate in this variatio 30% 7 of 28 what occured in the remote instruction condition the experimenter left the rooms and gave instrutions to the teaher via telephone 8 of 28 what was the obedience rate here 20.5% 9 of 28 what was the second situational variable location 10 of 28 where did he change location to a run down building rather than the prestigious Yale university 11 of 28 what was the impact on authority the experimenter had less authority in the new ocation 12 of 28 what happened to obedience fell to 47.5% 13 of 28 what was the third variable he tested uniform 14 of 28 what happened to the experimenter in this variation in original he wore a lab coat, but the role was played by a person dressed ordinarily in everyday clothes 15 of 28 what happened to obedience fell to 20% 16 of 28 who's research supports Milgram's situational varations Bickman 17 of 28 why people twice as likely to obey someone dressed as a security guard than a jacket and tie 18 of 28 which situational factor does Bickman's reseach support uniform 19 of 28 why is Milgram criticised for a lack of internal validity many believe pp thought the original study was fake, made even ore likely through the change in situational variables 20 of 28 which variation was especially unconvincing receiving instructions from a member of the public 21 of 28 what did Milgram accept about this variation it was so contrived pp may have worked out the truth 22 of 28 why is this an issue unclear whether genuine results 23 of 28 generally what have cross-cultural studies concluded generally supportive of Milgram 24 of 28 who tudied spanish students Miranda et al 25 of 28 what was the obedience rat for these Spanish students 90% 26 of 28 though what limits these cross-cultural studies often done in western societies so not super generlisable 27 of 28 how did Milgram demonstrate good control he systematically altered one variabe at a time, keeping everything else the same 28 of 28
Comments
No comments have yet been made