what was the percentage prevalence Pauls et al reported in first degree relatives with OCD
10%
1 of 8
What was the percentage risk of first degree relatives developing OCD that Nestadt et al found in his study
11.7%
2 of 8
in carey and gottesman study which they used the maudsley twin register what % concordance rate was found for MZ twins
80%
3 of 8
in carey and gottesman study which they used the maudsley twin register what % concordance rate was found for DZ twins
47%
4 of 8
in Lambert and Kinsley's study what % concordance rate did they find for MZ twins
53%
5 of 8
in Lambert and Kinsley's study what % concordance rate did they find for DZ twins
23%
6 of 8
Who found no evidence for higher concordance rates in MZ twins than DZ twins
Andrews et al
7 of 8
Who found much higher rates of concordance if people were included in the study if they had obsessive and compulsive symptoms but did qualify for full diagnosis
Pauls et al
8 of 8
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What was the percentage risk of first degree relatives developing OCD that Nestadt et al found in his study
Back
11.7%
Card 3
Front
in carey and gottesman study which they used the maudsley twin register what % concordance rate was found for MZ twins
Back
Card 4
Front
in carey and gottesman study which they used the maudsley twin register what % concordance rate was found for DZ twins
Back
Card 5
Front
in Lambert and Kinsley's study what % concordance rate did they find for MZ twins
Comments
No comments have yet been made