Those who taught spelling scaffolds skills in reading- proportionally did much better Uneven rel between the two because not the same for the spelling ability of those just learning to read
Vellutino & Scanlon (1987), also Wagner at al (1997)
test prior to school then G123, phonemic segmentation best predictor of later performance, vocab/semantic ability poorer prediction- 3 conditioned phonemic seg, response acqs, or control
7 of 11
Vellutino & Scanlon (1987)
only phonemic segmentation training improved reading in both previously good and poor readers
8 of 11
Melby-Lervag, Lyster & Hulme (2012)
TD & Dyslexia: Phonemic awareness larger unique contribution to word reading skills
9 of 11
See Katz & Frost 1992
Letter sound the same in that combination irrespective in transparent language italian or finnish, english is an opaque language
10 of 11
Ziegler et al., (2010)
Phonological Awareness predicted Reading Speed & Accuracy and Decoding Speed & Accuracy across all 5 languages PA even greater importance in opaque languages Vocab more important in transparent languages
Comments
No comments have yet been made