jargon aphasia

?
  • Created by: maryan
  • Created on: 13-12-16 13:30
Phonological impairments
when patients have difficulties assembling the proper sounds for words.
1 of 17
jargon aphasia
severe phonological impairment where the patients retreival/phonology is so muddled, you cant understand. it is one type of APHASIC impairment where there is fluent speech with a high proportion of phonological errors...
2 of 17
neologisms
is a word which has been entirely made up by an individuals which are normally nonsensical and unrecognizable. Typically associated with aphasia and SZ. What is NEOLOGISM? definition of NEOLOGISM (Psychology Dictionary)
3 of 17
characteristics of jargon aphasia:
fluent unintelligible speech (to much neologisms), has discernible syntactic and prosodic structure, grammatical and function words are preserved. prosodic and phonetic charactersitics preserved (Hanlon and Edmonton, 1996). sentence normal length
4 of 17
melodic countour is jargon aphasia is...
preserved.
5 of 17
what is there little evidence of
There is little evidence of the awareness of errors or attempts at self correcting
6 of 17
But, there is now recent evidence (Eaton, Marshal & Ping, 2011)
longitudinal study/ uncover mechanisms of change in indiv with JA/ also looked @ improved error awareness/ found sig increase in # of correct responses over time + sig decrease in prop of nonword errors/ increase in self-mon behav during testing.
7 of 17
different types of errors in JA
target related neologisms (nonword phon errors) + neologisms which are unintelligible words with preserved ending of words.
8 of 17
characteristics of non words errors
errors obey phonotactic constraints even in the case of complete jargon (Hanon and Edmonson,1996)/ respect freq distrib of phonemes in the patients lang (cohen et al, 1997)/ other cases distrib is idiosyncratic (Perecman and Brown, 1981)/
9 of 17
in non word errors the distribution is selective for...
non- Target related errors. (Butterworth, 1979)
10 of 17
evidence of non word errors is demonstrated via the case study of...
patient FF (Rose and Buchanan, 2007)/ portrays perfect constructions but has muddled parts/ unaware of errors/ patient repeats certain neologisms such as "pridy burger"
11 of 17
Recent study (Bose et al, 2013) explored the effects of therapy on neologisms
this is because it is relatively unexplored/ ff showed sig improvement in his ability to name the treated items/ more prop or real word responses and less neologisms/ evidenc for effective therapies
12 of 17
the decrease of proportion of neologisms with an increase in real world responses in error pattern and increased phonological overlap between target and neologism highlights....
ffs ability to atleast partially access correct phonological representations (Koho and Smithy, 1994)
13 of 17
Robson et al (2002) conducted a phonological investigation of non-word erros. They used the case study...
LT/ suffered left cerebral vascular accident in march 1995/ history consistent with the sugg of JA being *** with bilateral damage (Cappa et al, 1994).
14 of 17
Despite having severe neologistic JA, LT can produce...
discrete responses in naming tasks thus allowing the properties of his jargon to be investigated/ ability exploited in 2 naming tasks
15 of 17
what did the 2 naming tasks show?
1st showed LT's non-word errors are related to their targets despite being generally unrecognizable./ gen properties of errors sugg they are prod by lexical rather than non lexical means.
16 of 17
neogolistic errors may occur post lexical access (Alson, Romani and Holloran, 2006)
presented an analysis of single JA patients/ to come up with conclu: patt of correct + erroneous responses across tasks
17 of 17

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

severe phonological impairment where the patients retreival/phonology is so muddled, you cant understand. it is one type of APHASIC impairment where there is fluent speech with a high proportion of phonological errors...

Back

jargon aphasia

Card 3

Front

is a word which has been entirely made up by an individuals which are normally nonsensical and unrecognizable. Typically associated with aphasia and SZ. What is NEOLOGISM? definition of NEOLOGISM (Psychology Dictionary)

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

fluent unintelligible speech (to much neologisms), has discernible syntactic and prosodic structure, grammatical and function words are preserved. prosodic and phonetic charactersitics preserved (Hanlon and Edmonton, 1996). sentence normal length

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

preserved.

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all language impairments resources »