class differences in achievement (internal)

?
Howard Becker (1971)
Labelling - study of 60 high school teachers in Chicago, found that middle class students were closest to 'ideal pupil'
1 of 11
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Rosenthal and Jacobson - study of 'spurters'. Random IQ test, randomly selected 20% of pupils and said they'd boost ahead. Came back 1 year later and 47% of the 'spurters' improved drastically
2 of 11
A-to-C economy
Gillborn and Youdell - teachers less likely to see w/c or black students as having ability, put them in lower sets. Links to league tables - teachers focus their time on students that could achieve a C or higher
3 of 11
Educational Triage
Gillborn and Youdell - teachers will leave the students that will easily pass, focus on the ones with potential for a C, abandon the ones with 'no hope'
4 of 11
Differentiation (Lacey)
teachers categorising pupils according to how they perceive their ability, attitudes or behaviour (e.g. streaming)
5 of 11
Polarisation (Lacey)
pupils respond to streaming by moving towards two opposite 'poles' (pro-school and anti-school subcultures)
6 of 11
The anti-school subculture
placed in low streams = loss of self esteem = feel inferior. this pushes them to look for other ways of gaining status, mainly by inverting the school's values of hard work, obedience and punctuality.
7 of 11
Habitus (Bourdieu)
learned, taken for granted ways of thinking, being and acting that are shared by a particular social class
8 of 11
Symbolic capital
pupils who have been socialised at home into m/c tastes and preferences gain symbolic capital
9 of 11
Symbolic violence
the withholding of symbolic capital, schools devalue the w/c habitus so that w/c pupils' tastes are deemed to be worthless
10 of 11
Nike identities
symbolic violence led w/c pupils to seek alternative ways of creating self worth, status and value. constructed class identities by investing heavily in styles, especially branded clothing like Nike
11 of 11

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Rosenthal and Jacobson - study of 'spurters'. Random IQ test, randomly selected 20% of pupils and said they'd boost ahead. Came back 1 year later and 47% of the 'spurters' improved drastically

Back

Self-fulfilling prophecy

Card 3

Front

Gillborn and Youdell - teachers less likely to see w/c or black students as having ability, put them in lower sets. Links to league tables - teachers focus their time on students that could achieve a C or higher

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

Gillborn and Youdell - teachers will leave the students that will easily pass, focus on the ones with potential for a C, abandon the ones with 'no hope'

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

teachers categorising pupils according to how they perceive their ability, attitudes or behaviour (e.g. streaming)

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »