no def of religion but there is the understanding of beliefs. Kokkinakis v Greece
2 of 12
The belief must be coherent
X v Germany - app wanted his ashes to be scattered over the sea. Not a coherent belief.
3 of 12
Forgero v Norway
pupil forced to attend christianity classes. Negative freedoms.
4 of 12
Buscarini v San Marino
duty to swear on oath not enough violatio, it doid not affect the actual interum.
5 of 12
Connection to the actual belief
Arrowsmith v UK - Pascifist but the leaflets given out had no actual connection to the issue in question.
6 of 12
Prosyletism is a major issue in some countries eg ??
Kokkinaskis v Greece - they had an issue cos the Jevoha do this religious element, but against it.
7 of 12
Larisis v Greece
three penetcostal airforce agents which used their powers to convert members, this was bad.
8 of 12
Specific situtaion rule
Kalac v Turkey set it down. However, overcome by Dhlab & Eweida.
9 of 12
Religious dress
Dhlab and Leyla Sahin. Both putting on headscarfs, prevented from working and schooling. Held necessary.
10 of 12
Crucifix
Lautsi v Italy - no violation, crucfix is a passive symbol
11 of 12
Eweida and other v UK
Eweida - Violation - not proportionate, Chaplin no violation - health and safety. Ladelle- registar refused to perform gay marriages - no violation as this was a job requirement. McFarlan - no violation it was his job to give therapy
12 of 12
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Definition of religion
Back
no def of religion but there is the understanding of beliefs. Kokkinakis v Greece
Comments
No comments have yet been made