Assembley has been argued to include social gatherings such as hunting. Which case states this?
Friend and Others v. UK
2 of 17
M.C. v Germany states?
Sits in ...blocking an army barrack can be protected under the Article 11.
3 of 17
Are Assemblies protected where participants have violent intentions
No.. not protected.. Stankov v. Bulgaria
4 of 17
Christians against Rascism and Fascism v UK
If others have negative reactions it should not prohibit your right.
5 of 17
Negative Obligations.. Shouldnt be in place extra deterences
Macedoian Orgnaisation Llinden v Bulgaria
6 of 17
Posistive Obligations .. State put in place protection
Platform Arzte Fur Das Leben v Austria - No violation finally helped but they took long.
7 of 17
Posistive is restricted .. Private Land
Appleby v UK - Shopping centre.
8 of 17
Must be able to justify bans on individuals demostrations
Stankov & United Macedonian Organ Llinden v Bulgaria - Violatoion, ban on demostration but no justu
9 of 17
Freedom of Association
Collective enity, which involves both +- obligations
10 of 17
Political Parties, which entail scares to the MS
United Communist Party of Turkey v Turkey - political parties are of great importance thus its difficult that they arent dropped for the wrong reasons, In this case cos they had 'Communist' in their name.
11 of 17
Incomptaible to dissovle a political party which had high stance within the govern
Refah Partisi v Turkey - this was done because of the scare that they had the power to implement their communist and separtist view.
12 of 17
Trade Unions - can you force them to implement people
Aslef v UK - expelled BNP member not forced to join it was the Unions decision.
13 of 17
Closed Shop Agreements
employer agrees to hire union members only, and employees must remain members of the union at all times in order to remain employed
14 of 17
Open Shop Agreements
is a place of employment at which one is not required to join or financially support a union
15 of 17
Post Closed Shop
Young, James, Webster v UK - Employed British rail employees, then told after they were to join a union, Refused, violation if forced.
16 of 17
Pre Closed Shop
Sorensen and Rasmusen v Denmark - they kenw when signing up they would have to join a Union. However, it was his livelihood, thus cannot justisfy.
17 of 17
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Assembley has been argued to include social gatherings such as hunting. Which case states this?
Back
Friend and Others v. UK
Card 3
Front
M.C. v Germany states?
Back
Card 4
Front
Are Assemblies protected where participants have violent intentions
Comments
No comments have yet been made