Privity past paper
- Created by: Dashaa_k
- Created on: 17-12-14 21:44
‘The rule of privity can cause injustice but reforms in both statute and common law
have helped to avoid this injustice’.
Discuss the extent to which this statement is true. [50]
Mark Levels AO1 AO2 AO3
Level 5 21-25 17-20 -
Level 4 16-20 13-16 5
Level 3 11-15 9-12 4
Level 2 6-10 5-8 3
Level 1 1-5 1-4 1-2
Potential answers MAY:
Assessment Objective 1 (25)
Explain the rules of privity:
That a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to the contract,
Tweddle v Atkinson, Dunlop v Selfridge;
Candidates may explain that the rule comes from the need for the parties to have
given consideration to the agreement in order to enforce it.
Explain the exceptions developed by the courts:
The trust device; where an implied trust was used to avoid the rules of privity,
Les Affreteurs Reunis v Walford;
Restrictive covenants; where restrictions on the use of land can be passed to
subsequent purchasers, Tulk v Moxhay;
Collateral contracts; where a new contract was imposed by the court between a
person making a representation and the person who acted on that
representation, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products;
Special cases, where the courts have decided that one person may sue to
recover losses suffered by another party, Jackson v Horizon Holidays, Woodar v
Wimpey, Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge;
Credit can also be given…
Comments
No comments have yet been made