He said that social inequality was because of 3 things, these were : Class, status and party
Weberians believe that some people have better life chances than others
they believe that social class is a group of people who have similar market and work situations
they also believe that people can have social mobility between classes
1 of 5
similarities between Marx and Weber
Both Marx and Weber were concerned with who owns private property and who doesn't
both use a macro-structural approach
both saw the economic system of production as being an important source of social class
2 of 5
Differences between Marx and Weber
Weber rejected the 2 class model
He rejected that power was determined by ownership or non-ownership of the means of production
Weber identified 3 separate sources of power which he said had direct effort on people's lives
3 of 5
Weberian views on gender
men and women have different places to do with horizontal and vertical segregation
Baron and Norris (1976) believe that there are 2 labour markets: primary (high pay and secure jobs) and secondary (low pay with poor promotion)
women are more likely than men to be in the secondary labour market.
4 of 5
Weberianism and ethnicity
Ethnicity is more important than economic differences when explaining inequalities
Marginalised and almost underclass
studies
Parkin (1968)- minority ethnic groups are negatively privileged status groups- the glass ceiling becomes a concrete one- this means that for some groups, you can't see through the glass ceiling and certainly cannot reach the top jobs, this could then link to institutional racism.
Rex and Moore (1967)- minority groups are severly disadvantaged in the labour market- life chances and market position is bad compared to what it is for white people
Comments
No comments have yet been made