WAR AND PEACE
- Created by: _Holly98
- Created on: 20-03-16 12:14
EXAMPLES OF WAR
ENGLISH CIVIL WAR
- KINSHIP VS DEMOCRACY
WORLD WAR ONE
IRAQ WAR
- BUSH & BLAIR CLAIMS REASON BELIEVE SUDDAM HUSSEIN
COLD WAR
- COMMUNISM VS CAPITALISM
CAUSES OF WAR
- RELIGION
- MONEY
- TERRORISM
- GREED FOR LAND / NATURAL RESOURCES
- DICTAORSHUPS
- NATIONALISM
- THREAT NUCLEUR WEAPONS
- RACISM
- POVERTY / POOR LIVING CONDITIONS
CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY - JUST WAR THEORY
A WAR FOUGHT RIGHT REASON RIGHT WAY
ST AUGUSTINE - DEVELOPED AQUINAS - SUMMA THEOLOGICA
- PROPER AUTHORITY
- JUST CAUSE
- ESTABLISH GOOD
- RESONABLE CHANCE SUCCESS
- LAST RESORT
- SUFFICENT FORCE
- CONTROLLED VIOLENCE
CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY - JUST WAR THEORY
A WAR FOUGHT RIGHT REASON RIGHT WAY
ST AUGUSTINE - DEVELOPED AQUINAS - SUMMA THEOLOGICA
- PROPER AUTHORITY
- JUST CAUSE
- ESTABLISH GOOD
- RESONABLE CHANCE SUCCESS
- LAST RESORT
- SUFFICENT FORCE
- CONTROLLED VIOLENCE
JUS AD BELLUM - JUSTIVE RESORTING WAR - DEONTOLOGI
JUST AUTHORITY
JUST CAUSE
JUST INTENTION
COMPARATIVE JUSTIVE - VALUES SO IMPORTANT? THOSE ATTACKED DESERVE IT?
PROPORTIONALITY - MUST BE IN PROPORTION
LAST RESORT - REASONABLE CHANCE SUCCESS
INTENTION - SYNDERISIS RULE
PROBLEM: WHAT CONSTITUTES LEGITIMATE LEADER
NON DEMOCRATIC - ARMY LEADER STILL LEADER
CIVIL WARS OR WARS BETWEEN NATIONS
HOW DEFINE WHEN ITS A WAR?
PROBLEM: WHAT CONSTITUTES A JUST CAUSE
DEFENCE OWN NATION / VULNERABLE NATION / BREECH HUMAN RIGHTS
NOT CASE OIL / TERRITORY
GOING WAR ACHIEVE PEACE ILLOGICAL
TELEOLOGICAL ASPECT - CANT PREDICT OUTCOME
PROBLEM: WHEN IS THE LAST RESORT THE LAST RESORT
PACIFIST SAY NEVER LAST RESORT
LEAVING WAR LAST RESORT TOO LONG - ENEMY CHANCE PREPARE
PRACTICAL ISSUES - ARGUABLE NOT CONSIDERED IN A MORAL DECISION
CANT KNOW - TELELOGICAL
JUS IN BELLO - JUSTICE CONDUCT WAR
PROPORTIONATE FORCE
DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN TARGETS (LEGITIMATE AND NON-LEGITIMATE)
PROBLEM: WHO IS LEGITIMATE / INNOCENT
COMBATANTS - THOSE FIGHTING & CIVILLIANS
CONSCRIPTS - DONT HAVE CHOICE FIGHT
POLITICAL LEADERS
MUNITIONS / WEAPON PRODUCERS
FUNDING FOR WAR - TAX PAYERS & FARMERS
JUST POST BELLUM - JUSTICE AFTER WAR TELEOLOGICAL
JUS POST BELLUM CONSIDERED IMPORTANT JUSTICE BEFORE AND DURING CONFLICT
PLAYS IMPORTANT PART MODERN JUST WAR THEORY (BEEN IGNORED EARLIER FORMS)
BRIAN OREND REGARDS OUTCOME AS CRUCIAL & ARGUES THEIR MUST BE AN ETHICAL STRATEGY
JUST CAUSE FOR TERMINATION
REASONABLE VINDICATION OF RIGHTS VIOLATED & AGGRESSOR WILLING NEGOTIATE TERMS OF SURRENDER
TERMS SURRENDER INCLUDE FORMAL APOLOY / COMPENSATIONS / WAR CRIME TRIALS AND REHABILITATION
STATE END WAR COMES CLEAR GOALS CANT BE REACHED WITHOUT USING EXCESS FORCE
RIGHT INTENTION
STATE MUST ONLY TERMINATE WAR UNDER CONDITIONS AGREED UPON
REVENGE NOT PERMITTED
VICTOR STATE WILLING APPLY SAME LEVEL INVESTIAGTION WAR CRIMES ARMED FORCES COULD COMMITTED
PUBLIC DECLERATION & AUTHORITY
TERMS OF PEACE MADE LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
MUST BE ACCEPTED LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
DISCRIMMINATION
VICTOR STATE DIFFERENTIATE POLICTICAL / MILITART LEADERS / COMBATANTS / CIVILLIANS
PUNITIVE MEASURES LIMITED DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE CONFLICT
PROPORTIONALITY
TERMS SURRENDER PROPORTIONAL RIGHTS INITIALLY VIOLATED
DRACONIAN MEASURES / ANY ATTEMPT DENYING SURRENDERD COUNTRY THE RIGHT PARTICIPATE IN WORLD COMMUNITY ARE NOT PERMITTED
GROTIUS-BOXING RING ANALOGY
GROTIOUS - ARGUED STATE JUSTIFIED WAR - EVERYONE ON 'RIGHT SIDE' INNOCENT - OTHER SIDE LEGITIAMTE THREAT
NORMALLY PEOPLE RIGHT NOT BE PUNCHED, BOXERS SURRENDERED RIGHT IN THE RING
COMBATANTS SURRENDER RIGHT NOT BE KILLED ENTER WAR ARENA
THE PRINCIPLE DOUBLE EFFECT
MILITARY TARGET SIGNIFICANT RELATIVLEY CERTAIN DESTROYED / EFFORTS TAKEN DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COMBATANTS AND NON-COMBATANTS REDUCE POSSIBILITY COLLATERAL DAMAGE ARGUED IT IS JUSTIFED
INNOCENT CIVILLIANS DIES AS NO ALTERNATIVE
US & VIETNAM. US SPRAYED NAPLAM - VAPORIZE ALL LIVING THERE PEOPLE HIDING SOLDIERS
CANT APPLY DOUBLE EFFECT NO EFFORT DISTINGUISH COMBATANTS & NON-COMABTANTS
STRENGTHS OF JUST WAR THEORY
TRIED PROTECT INNOCENT VICTIME WARFARE
ECNOURAGES COMBATS THINK MORAL IMPLICATIONS
REJECTS VIEW NO RULES OF CONDUCT IN WAR SITUATIONS
CULTURE, TRADITIONS & LAWS DEFETED COUNTRY RESPECTED - PREVEN FUTURE CONFLICT
UNIVERSAL THEORY BUT FLEXIBLE AS GROWS WITH TIMES
WEAKNESS OF JUST WAR THEORY
HARD TELL WHOSE INNOCENT & GUILTY
SOME COUNTRIES CONSCRIPTON - ARE THEY COMBATS?
ARGUED CONCEPT OF WAR & JUSTICE ARE INCOMPATIBLE
WEAPONS MASS DESTRUCTION / TERRORISTS DEMAND DIFFERENT APPROACH - BREAK BASIC RULE
CLASH BETWEEN STATES FAILS SAY WHAT TO DO
OPEN ABUSE - WANT JUSTIFY WAR FOR UNJUST ULTERIOR MOTIVES WILL FIND A WAY
WALTER WINK
WALTER WINK - DISAGREED AUGUSTINE TEACHING LED CHRISTIANS WRONG PATH - NEVER JUST REASON WAR
JUSTIVE BROUGHT EQUALITY & FAIRNESS - CANT ACHIEVE WAR SO CONTRADICTION TERMS
PACIFISM
BELIEF VIOLENCE WAR ALWAYS WRONG
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES PEACFULLY RESOLVED
WORK IMPROVE SOCIETY / REMOVE CAUSE FOR WAR
"I AM A MILITANT PACIFIST WILLING FIGHT PEACE NOTHING END WAR UNLESS PEOPLE REFUSE TO GO" - EINSTEEN
TYPES OF PACIFISM
RELIGIOUS PACIFISM - QUAKERS FOLOW JESUS PACIFIST EXAMPLE
ETHICAL PACIFISM - NON THEISTS PACIFISTS NON RELIGIOUS REASONS
ABSOLOUTE PACIFISTS - DOESNT ALLOW VIOLENCE ANY SITUATION - ABSOLOUTE PROHIBITION OF VIOLENCE & WAR
CONTINGENT PACIFISM AGAINST DOCTRINAL ABSOLOUTE PROHIBITION. ALLOW SOMETIMES
CRITICISMS ABSOLOUTE PACIFISM
FAILS ACKNOWLEDGE HUMAN SINFULNESS.
REINHOLD NEIBUR ARGUED CHRISTIAN REALISM - CANT ACHIEVE ETHICAL IDEAS AS SIN IS PRESENT EVERYONE. CHRISTIANS SOMETIMES USE FORCE FIGHT EVIL ESTABLISH JUSTICE
FAILS PROTECT INNOCENT. ASNSCOME ARGUED IMMORAL FAILS PROTECT SUFFER GENOCIDE. DENIES SELF DEFENCE
FAILURE ACT (OMISSION) BLAMEWORTHY AS ACTING. SINGER ARGUE CONSEQUENCE DEFINE GOOD AND BADNESS OF ACT - WE FAIL STOP GENOCICE WE ARE RESONSIBLE
KEY THINKERS
"EVIL WILL ALWAYS FLOURISH WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING" - BURKE
"NON-VIOLENCE IS THE ESSENCE OF THE GOSPEL" - WNK
"THE LORD IS DISARMING PETER, UNBELTED EVERY SOLDIER" - TERTULLIAN
MCMAHON - PACIFISM DIFFICULT MANTAIN AS TAKES AWAY VICTIMS RIGHT TO DECIDE WHETHER VIOLENCE APPROPRIATE OR NOT
CHRISTIAN REALISM
CLAIMS CODE ETHICS INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENT THAN THE STATE
ACTION MORALLY WRONG INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTABLE STATE
WRONG INDIVIDUAL IIE BUT OKAY FOR STATE PROTECT ITSELF
NIEBUHR REINHOLD
PROTESTANT THEOLOGIAN - LUTHERAN MINISTER CLAIMS:
CANT MAKE PERFECT CHOICES - NATURE EVIL - USE FORCE MANTAIN JUST ORDERED SOCIETY
STATE ACT ACCORDING OWN CRITERIA
PRIVATE & PUBLC MORALITY SEPERATE. NATIONAL INTEREST GO TO WAR - ACCEPTABLE -
PACIFISTS DONT REALISE GOD ACTING THROUGH HUMAN INSTITUTIONS - GOVERNMENT
NATURAL LAW
PRESERVATION LIFE - WAR DO THIS - INVOLVE COLLATERAL DAMAGE
LIVE SOCIETY - WAR DEFEND ORDER / SOCIETY
NOT TELEOGICAL - ENDS DONT JUSTIFY MEANS
AQUINAS - CONTRIBUTER THEORY
UTILITARIANISM
RELATIVE
TELELOGICAL
ACT - SITUATION JUDGED OWN MERITS
RULE - MORE PEOPLE HAPPIER WAR LAST RESORT OR WITH PACIFISM
PREFERENCE - FUND MILITARY BETTER USED HUMANITARIAN AID
BIBLICAL ETHICS
QUAKERS ARGUE JESUS PACIFIST
TEXT SUPPORT OR AGAINST WAR
BLESSED PEACEMAKERS
LOVE NEIGHBOUR
SELL CLOAKS & BUY SWORDS
LORD WARRIOR
KANT & KILLING
PEACE DUTY - SECURED NATIONS WORK TOGETHER
STATE DEFEND AGAINST ATTACK
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT - PUNISH PROPORTIONATE CRIME - COMMIT MURDER - PUT DEATH
SUICIDE - TREATING MEANS
UNIVERSAL PEACE - REASON DICTATES - WAR GRAVEST INJUSTIVE - AVOID
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Peace is rooted in the depths of Chinese »
- Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies June 12,19,26th »
- cold war a level predictions »
- A level cold war history exam 2023 predictions »
- A-Level History NEA Coursework Topic »
- Which Megadeth songs are worth listening to? »
- help with villain motivation »
- Had the Ottoman Empire been Christian rather than Muslim »
- GCSE History Conflict and Tension Interwar years 1918-1939 »
- [Official thread] Hamas-Israel Conflict »
Comments
No comments have yet been made