Argued from design 'qua regularity'.
Unintelligent creatures each have a goal or purpose in life yet they must be led, so showing elements of design. HOWEVER: as unintelligent creatures cannot reach this purpose on their own thus a divine and intelligent being must exist to take the creature to the goal as it would not be able to do so without a God!
He uses the analogy of an ARROW:
To reach its target it must have been guided by a superior intelligence (archer). So for an animal to reach its goal it must have been guided by a superior intelligence (GOD)
A logical argument from when Aquinas believed the Earth and humans were at the centre of the universe and were God's focus BUT the world is not at the centre of the universe, the universe is in fact a complex mechanism that could exist independantly of Gods help.
The complexity of the universe could then in fact be used to further the design argument. Such a massive creation could not be anyone but God?
Comments
No comments have yet been made