|
Advantages
- The trained interviewer can rephrase questions and clear up any misunderstandings
- Rather than sticking to pre-set questions, interviewers can prove and ask follow-up questions. This allows them to explore complex issues
- Interviewees can develop their answers and explain their views in detail
- Unstructured interviews give an in-depth and rich account of the topic being studied
- They provide a more valid or authentic picture of the topic
|
Disadvantages
- Compared with other methods, unstructured interviews are often time consuming and expensive for the amount of data that is collected.
- The interviewer must have the skills needed to keep the conversation going and encourage interviewees to 'open up'
- The interview effect: If the interview bias occurs the results will not be valid.
- The interviewer effect: if interviewer bias occurs the results will be invalid.
- Unstructured interviews are not standardizing so they are difficult to replicate in order to check whether the findings are reliable.
- Compared with social surveys, fewer unstructured interviews can be carried out so the sample size is smaller. This makes it difficult to generalize from the sample to the wider population.
|
Comments
No comments have yet been made